Chapter 4 Litigation

作者: Kathryn E. Spier

DOI: 10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01004-3

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The purpose of this chapter is to survey the academic literature on economics litigation and synthesize its main themes. begins by introducing basic economic framework for studying out-of-court settlement. One set issues addressed positive (or descriptive) in nature. Under what conditions will someone decide file suit? What determines how much spent a lawsuit? When do cases settle out court? Important normative are also addressed. Are decisions made private parties interest society as whole? Next, surveys some more active areas literature. Topics include rules evidence, loser-pays rules, appeals, contingent fees attorneys, alternative dispute resolution, class actions, plea bargaining.

参考文章(228)
Ronald J. Gilson, Robert H. Mnookin, Disputing through Agents: Cooperation and Conflict between Lawyers in Litigation Columbia Law Review. ,vol. 94, pp. 509- 566 ,(1994) , 10.2307/1123202
Louis Kaplow, Louis Kaplow, Accuracy in Adjudication Social Science Research Network. ,(1996)
Lisa Bernstein, Understanding the Limits of Court-Connected ADR: A Critique of Federal Court-Annexed Arbitration Programs University of Pennsylvania Law Review. ,vol. 141, pp. 2169- ,(1993) , 10.2307/3312494
Boudewijn Bouckaert, Gerrit de Geest, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics ,(2000)
Richard A. Posner, The Summary Jury Trial and Other Methods of Alternative Dispute Resolution: Some Cautionary Observations The University of Chicago Law Review. ,vol. 53, pp. 366- ,(1986) , 10.2307/1599644
Jay Pil Choi, Patent Litigation as an Information Transmission Mechanism The American Economic Review. ,vol. 88, pp. 1249- 1263 ,(1998) , 10.7916/D8GH9RFW
Lewis A Kornhauser, Modeling Collegial Courts. II. Legal Doctrine Journal of Law Economics & Organization. ,vol. 8, pp. 441- 470 ,(1992)
David A Butz, Durable-Good Monopoly and Best-Price Provisions The American Economic Review. ,vol. 80, pp. 1062- 1076 ,(1990)
Steven Shavell, Steven Shavell, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law ,(2004)