A systematic review of occipital cervical fusion: techniques and outcomes.

作者: Corbett D. Winegar , James P. Lawrence , Brian C. Friel , Carmella Fernandez , Joseph Hong

DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE08143

关键词:

摘要: OBJECT Numerous techniques have been historically used for occipitocervical fusion with varied results. The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes various surgical in patients disease states elucidate the most efficacious method stabilization junction. METHODS A literature search peer-reviewed articles performed using PubMed and CINAHL/Ovid. key words "occipitocervical fusion," fixation," "cervical instrumentation," instrumentation" were relevant articles. Thirty-four studies identified that met criteria. Within these studies, 799 adult who underwent posterior analyzed radiographic clinical including rate, time fusion, neurological outcomes, rate adverse events. RESULTS No stronger than Class IV literature. Among within cited articles, use screw/rod instrumentation constructs associated a lower postoperative events (33.33%) (p < 0.0001), rates failure (7.89%) improved (81.58%) 0.0001) when compared wiring/rod, screw/plate, onlay situ bone grafting techniques. technique highest wiring rods (95.9%) = 0.0484), which also demonstrated shortest 0.0064). Screw/rod had high fusing 93.02% cases. When comparing depending on status, inflammatory diseases lowest (0%) improvement (90.91%) following Occipitocervical treatment tumors by (57.14%) 0.0089). Traumatic causes instability percentage pain screw/plates (100% improvement) 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Based existing literature, are very favorable all categories assessed processes. For requiring arthrodesis diseases, while is least outcomes. diagnosis tumor successful techniques, arthrodesis. nonspecified group improvement.

参考文章(47)
C S Ranawat, P OʼLeary, P Pellicci, P Tsairis, P Marchisello, L Dorr, Cervical spine fusion in rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. ,vol. 61, pp. 1003- 1010 ,(1979) , 10.2106/00004623-197961070-00006
S B Wertheim, H H Bohlman, Occipitocervical fusion. Indications, technique, and long-term results in thirteen patients. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. ,vol. 69, pp. 833- 836 ,(1987) , 10.2106/00004623-198769060-00006
Howard S. An, Internal Fixation of the Cervical Spine: Current Indications and Techniques. Journal of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. ,vol. 3, pp. 194- 206 ,(1995) , 10.5435/00124635-199507000-00002
Scott C. Robertson, Arnold H. Menezes, Occipital calvarial bone graft in posterior occipitocervical fusion. Spine. ,vol. 23, pp. 249- 254 ,(1998) , 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00020
Vijendra K. Jain, Piyush Mittal, Deepu Banerji, Sanjay Behari, Rajesh Acharya, Devendra K. Chhabra, Posterior occipitoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with occipitalized atlas Journal of Neurosurgery. ,vol. 84, pp. 559- 564 ,(1996) , 10.3171/JNS.1996.84.4.0559
T. Glenn Pait, Ossama Al-Mefty, Frederick A. Boop, Kenan I. Arnautovic, Salim Rahman, Wade Ceola, Inside-outside technique for posterior occipitocervical spine instrumentation and stabilization: preliminary results. Journal of Neurosurgery. ,vol. 90, pp. 1- 7 ,(1999) , 10.3171/SPI.1999.90.1.0001
Richard Löfvenberg, Eva B. Löfvenberg, Olof Ahlgren, A case of occipitocervical fusion in myeloma Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. ,vol. 61, pp. 81- 83 ,(1990) , 10.3109/17453679008993073