You have been framed! How antecedents of information need mediate the effects of risk communication messages.

作者: T. Terpstra , R. Zaalberg , J. de Boer , W. J. W. Botzen

DOI: 10.1111/RISA.12181

关键词:

摘要: This study investigates the processes that mediate effects of framing flood risks on people's information needs. Insight into risk frames is important for developing balanced communication explains both and benefits living near water. The research was inspired by seeking processing model related models. In a web-based survey, respondents (n = 1,457) were randomly assigned to one three or control frame (experimental conditions). Each identically explained additionally refined message emphasizing climate change, quality management, amenities We tested extent which perceptions, trust, affective responses need. As expected, average resulted in higher need than frame. Attempts lower fear appeal stressing safety instead change marginally successful, phenomenon known as “negativity bias.” Framing mediated negative attributes (risk perception affect) but not positive (trust affect). finding calls theoretical refinement. Practically, messages will be more effective when they stimulate perceptions evoke affect. However, arousal may have unwanted side effects. For instance, could lead levels trust management among citizens. Regular monitoring citizens’ attitudes prevent extreme distrust cynicism.

参考文章(38)
Wim Kellens, Teun Terpstra, Philippe De Maeyer, Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 33, pp. 24- 49 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2012.01844.X
Ruud Zaalberg, Cees J. H. Midden, Living Behind Dikes: Mimicking Flooding Experiences Risk Analysis. ,vol. 33, pp. 866- 876 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2012.01868.X
Wouter Poortinga, Nick F. Pidgeon, Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation Risk Analysis. ,vol. 23, pp. 961- 972 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1539-6924.00373
Reuben M. Baron, David A. Kenny, The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 51, pp. 1173- 1182 ,(1986) , 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Richard E. Petty, David W. Schumann, Steven A. Richman, Alan J. Strathman, Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect Under High- and Low-Elaboration Conditions Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 64, pp. 5- 20 ,(1993) , 10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.5
Robert A.C. Ruiter, Charles Abraham, Gerjo Kok, Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology & Health. ,vol. 16, pp. 613- 630 ,(2001) , 10.1080/08870440108405863
Kim Witte, Mike Allen, A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns Health Education & Behavior. ,vol. 27, pp. 591- 615 ,(2000) , 10.1177/109019810002700506
LeeAnn Kahlor, PRISM: A Planned Risk Information Seeking Model Health Communication. ,vol. 25, pp. 345- 356 ,(2010) , 10.1080/10410231003775172
Mathew P. White, Sabine Pahl, Marc Buehner, Andres Haye, Trust in risky messages: the role of prior attitudes. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 23, pp. 717- 726 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1539-6924.00350