Intranasal ipratropium bromide for the common cold.

作者: Zaina H AlBalawi , Sahar S Othman , Khalid AlFaleh

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008231.PUB3

关键词:

摘要: Background: The common cold is one of the most illnesses in humans and constitutes an economic burden both terms productivity expenditure for treatment. There no proven cure symptomatic relief mainstay use intranasal ipratropium bromide (IB) has been addressed several studies might prove effective treatment cold. Objectives: To determine effect IB versus placebo or on severity rhinorrhoea nasal congestion children adults with Subjective overall improvement was another primary outcome side effects were reported as a secondary outcome. Search strategy: We searched Cochrane Central Register Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2011, Issue 1) which contains Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1950 to January week 4, 2011), in-process other non-indexed citations (February EMBASE (1974 February AMED (1985 Biosis 2011) LILACS 2011). Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Data collection analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data assessed trial quality. used standardised form extract relevant we contacted additional information. Main results: Seven total 2144 participants included. Four (1959 participants) subjective change rhinorrhoea. All consistent reporting statistically significant changes favour IB. Nasal four found have between two groups. positive response group global assessment improvement. Side more frequent group, odds ratio (OR) 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40 3.11). Commonly encountered included dryness, blood tinged mucus epistaxis. Authors' conclusions: For people cold, existing evidence, some limitations, suggests that likely be ameliorating had its associated compared although these appeared well-tolerated self-limiting. need larger, high-quality effectiveness relieving symptoms.

参考文章(35)
Anita Stewart, John Ware, Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach Duke University Press. ,(1992) , 10.7249/CB361
Julian P. T. Higgins, Sally Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ,(2019)
Tim Kenealy, Bruce Arroll, Antibiotics for the common cold and acute purulent rhinitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 2013, ,(2013) , 10.1002/14651858.CD000247.PUB3
Xiaoge Zhang, Taixiang Wu, Jing Zhang, Qiu Yan, Lingxia Xie, Guan J Liu, Chinese medicinal herbs for the common cold. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,(2007) , 10.1002/14651858.CD004782.PUB2
Meenu Singh, Rashmi R Das, Zinc for the common cold Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 2015, ,(2015) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001364.PUB4
Kenneth T. Kim, Edward Kerwin, Lawrence Landwehr, Jonathan A. Bernstein, Dawn Bruner, Duane Harris, Kristin Drda, Jack Wanger, Chester C. Wood, Use of 0.06% ipratropium bromide nasal spray in children aged 2 to 5 years with rhinorrhea due to a common cold or allergies. Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology. ,vol. 94, pp. 73- 79 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61289-6
Meenu Singh, Rashmi R Das, Zinc for the common cold Wiley-Blackwell. ,(2011) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001364.PUB3
Frederick G. Hayden, Effectiveness and Safety of Intranasal Ipratropium Bromide in Common Colds Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 125, pp. 89- 97 ,(1996) , 10.7326/0003-4819-125-2-199607150-00002
L DIAMOND, R DOCKHORN, J GROSSMAN, J KISICKI, M POSNER, M ZINNY, P KOKER, D KORTS, M WECKER, A dose-response study of the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide nasal spray in the treatment of the common cold The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. ,vol. 95, pp. 1139- 1146 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0091-6749(95)70219-9