Individual sensitivity to framing effects

作者: Emmanuel Flachaire , Guillaume Hollard

DOI: 10.1016/J.JEBO.2006.10.006

关键词:

摘要: Surveys are sometimes viewed with suspicion when used to provide economic values, since they sensitive framing effects. However, the extent which those effects may vary between individuals has received little attention. Are some less than others? We use theory of social representation assign each individual a new variable serve as proxy for individual's sensitivity This allows gather and relevant information limit impact examine two effects, starting-point bias illingness-to-pay willingness-to-accept divergence.

参考文章(26)
Glynis M. Breakwell, David V. Canter, Empirical Approaches to Social Representations Clarendon Press , Oxford University Press. ,(1993)
David S Brookshire, Don L Coursey, Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures The American Economic Review. ,vol. 77, pp. 554- 566 ,(1987)
W. Michael Hanemann, SOME ISSUES IN CONTINUOUS - AND DISCRETE - RESPONSE CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDIES Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. ,vol. 14, pp. 5- 13 ,(1985) , 10.1017/S0899367X00000702
Jason F. Shogren, Dermot J. Hayes, Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: Reply The American Economic Review. ,vol. 84, pp. 255- 270 ,(1994)
John C. Whitehead, Incentive Incompatibility and Starting-Point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions Land Economics. ,vol. 78, pp. 285- 297 ,(2002) , 10.2307/3147274
Elfriede Penz, Katja Meier-Pesti, Erich Kirchler, “It's practical, but no more controllable”: Social representations of the electronic purse in Austria Journal of Economic Psychology. ,vol. 25, pp. 771- 787 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.JOEP.2003.07.002
Paul Slovic, The Construction of Preference American Psychologist. ,vol. 50, pp. 364- 371 ,(1995) , 10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364
Jean Viaud, Christine Roland-Lévy, A positional and representational analysis of consumption. Households when facing debt and credit Journal of Economic Psychology. ,vol. 21, pp. 411- 432 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00011-8