作者: Michael J. Baker , Matthieu Quignard , Kristine Lund , Arnauld Séjourné
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_4
关键词:
摘要: Cutting across the common distinction between learning to argue and arguing learn, this research is concerned with learn argumentative knowledge, or broadening deepening understanding of space debate. A secondary school experiment compared broadening/deepening a debate on genetically modified organisms, using either CHAT tool, else an argument-diagram tool (DREW: Dialogical Reasoning Educational Web tool) that was designed as medium for interactive Although there no significant difference quality students' texts before after debating conditions, new interaction analysis method ("Rainbow") revealed differences in expression elaboration arguments.