COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING IN THE SPACE OF DEBATE

作者: Michael J. Baker , Matthieu Quignard , Kristine Lund , Arnauld Séjourné

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_4

关键词:

摘要: Cutting across the common distinction between learning to argue and arguing learn, this research is concerned with learn argumentative knowledge, or broadening deepening understanding of space debate. A secondary school experiment compared broadening/deepening a debate on genetically modified organisms, using either CHAT tool, else an argument-diagram tool (DREW: Dialogical Reasoning Educational Web tool) that was designed as medium for interactive Although there no significant difference quality students' texts before after debating conditions, new interaction analysis method ("Rainbow") revealed differences in expression elaboration arguments.

参考文章(12)
The Role of Communication in Learning To Model The Role of Communication in Learning To Model. pp. 352- 352 ,(2013) , 10.4324/9781410606280
Matthieu Quignard, A collaborative model of argumentation in dyadic problem-solving interactions Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA’02). pp. 69- 86 ,(2002) , 10.1075/CVS.2.07QUI
James F. Voss, Mary L. Means, Learning to Reason via Instruction in Argumentation. Learning and Instruction. ,vol. 1, pp. 337- 350 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X
Stephen Edelston Toulmin, The uses of argument ,(1958)
Ton de Jong, Jan van der Meij, Learning with Multiple Representations ,(1998)
Erica de Vries, Kristine Lund, Michael Baker, Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions The Journal of the Learning Sciences. ,vol. 11, pp. 63- 103 ,(2002) , 10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_3
Willis James Edmondson, Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis ,(1982)
Pierre Coirier, Jerry Andriessen, Foundations of argumentative text processing Studies in Writing. ,(2000) , 10.5117/9789053563403