Social norms and the paradox of elections' turnout ∗

作者: Jo�o Amaro de Matos , Pedro P. Barros

DOI: 10.1007/S11127-004-2251-4

关键词:

摘要: People vote although their marginal gain from voting is zero.We contribute to the resolution of this paradox by presentinga model for equilibrium configuration attitudes regardingthe decision vote. Each individual seen as an element ofa social network, within which pairs individuals expressideas and attitudes, exerting mutual influence. We therole such networks in propagating influenceacross individuals. show that it may suffice thata small set have a strong feeling about showingup generate significant turnout elections.

参考文章(45)
John H. Aldrich, Perspectives on public choice: When is it rational to vote? Cambridge University Press. pp. 373- 390 ,(1996) , 10.1017/CBO9780511664458.018
Dennis C. Mueller, Public choice II Cambridge University Press. ,(1989)
Timothy J. Feddersen, Wolfgang Pesendorfer, The Swing Voter's Curse The American Economic Review. ,vol. 86, pp. 408- 424 ,(1996)
John G. Matsusaka, Filip Palda, Voter turnout: How much can we explain? Public Choice. ,vol. 98, pp. 431- 446 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1018328621580
Steven N. Durlauf, Steven N. Durlauf, Statistical Mechanics Approaches to Socioeconomic Behavior Social Science Research Network. ,(1996)
Colin J. Thompson, Mathematical Statistical Mechanics ,(1972)
Valentina Corradi, Antonella Ianni, Consensus, contagion and clustering in a space-time model of public opinion formation Research Papers in Economics. ,(2000)
Bruno S. Frey, Why do high income people participate more in politics Public Choice. ,vol. 11, pp. 101- 105 ,(1971) , 10.1007/BF01726215
JOEL M. GUTTMAN, NAFTALI HILGER, YOCHANAN SHACHMUROVE, Voting as Investment vs. Voting as Consumption: New Evidence Kyklos. ,vol. 47, pp. 197- 207 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1467-6435.1994.TB02255.X