Barriers to home dialysis: Unraveling the tapestry of policy

作者: Rachel B. Fissell , Kerri L. Cavanaugh

DOI: 10.1111/SDI.12939

关键词:

摘要: Home dialysis use as a treatment for end-stage kidney disease varies locally, nationally, and internationally. There is call to action in the United States significantly increase access uptake of home preferred option. Although most do not object patient choice modality selection, reality that there are multilevel barriers both obvious subtle interfere with expanding access. Financial how payment structured continue be key drivers, although new models care emerging include first time incentives rather than penalties regarding dialysis. Resources support implementation expert personnel requiring educational training. Policies training curriculum content only specified within nephrology but also these multidisciplinary providers requisite successful ensure professional expertise ready available, cultivate champions broader community. Perhaps importantly, innovation through expanded investment research necessary advance practices, elevate quality, improve outcomes. Policy variety sectors at local, regional, national, international levels has potential drastically drive expansion increasing success

参考文章(33)
José A. Morfín, Alex Yang, Elizabeth Wang, Brigitte Schiller, Transitional dialysis care units: A new approach to increase home dialysis modality uptake and patient outcomes Seminars in Dialysis. ,vol. 31, pp. 82- 87 ,(2018) , 10.1111/SDI.12651
Jose J. Perez, Bo Zhao, Samaya Qureshi, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Kevin F. Erickson, Health Insurance and the Use of Peritoneal Dialysis in the United States American Journal of Kidney Diseases. ,vol. 71, pp. 479- 487 ,(2018) , 10.1053/J.AJKD.2017.09.024
Rajnish Mehrotra, Peritoneal dialysis education: Challenges and innovation Seminars in Dialysis. ,vol. 31, pp. 107- 110 ,(2018) , 10.1111/SDI.12666
Joel D. Glickman, Rebecca Kurnik Seshasai, Home hemodialysis education during postdoctoral training: Challenges and innovations Seminars in Dialysis. ,vol. 31, pp. 111- 114 ,(2018) , 10.1111/SDI.12673
Brendan Bowman, Sijie Zheng, Alex Yang, Brigitte Schiller, José A. Morfín, Melvin Seek, Robert S. Lockridge, Improving Incident ESRD Care Via a Transitional Care Unit. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. ,vol. 72, pp. 278- 283 ,(2018) , 10.1053/J.AJKD.2018.01.035
Arjan van der Tol, Norbert Lameire, Rachael L. Morton, Wim Van Biesen, Raymond Vanholder, An International Analysis of Dialysis Services Reimbursement. Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology. ,vol. 14, pp. 84- 93 ,(2019) , 10.2215/CJN.08150718
Fozia Ajmal, Janice Probst, John Brooks, James Hardin, Zaina Qureshi, Association between Freestanding Dialysis Facility Size and Medicare Quality Incentive Program Performance Scores. American Journal of Nephrology. ,vol. 49, pp. 64- 73 ,(2019) , 10.1159/000495262
Christina Bradshaw, Noble Gracious, Ranjit Narayanan, Sajith Narayanan, Mohammed Safeer, Geetha M. Nair, Praveen Murlidharan, Aiswarya Sundaresan, Syamraj Retnaraj Santhi, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Manjula Kurella Tamura, Vivekanand Jha, Glenn M. Chertow, Panniyammakal Jeemon, Shuchi Anand, Paying for Hemodialysis in Kerala, India: A Description of Household Financial Hardship in the Context of Medical Subsidy. Kidney International Reports. ,vol. 4, pp. 390- 398 ,(2019) , 10.1016/J.EKIR.2018.12.007
Martin Howell, Rachael C. Walker, Kirsten Howard, Cost Effectiveness of Dialysis Modalities: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. ,vol. 17, pp. 315- 330 ,(2019) , 10.1007/S40258-018-00455-2
Bryan N. Becker, Allen R. Nissenson, Integrated Care in ESKD: Perspective of a Large Dialysis Organization. Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology. ,vol. 14, pp. 445- 447 ,(2019) , 10.2215/CJN.08300718