作者: Manuel Rausch , Hermann J. Müller , Michael Zehetleitner
DOI: 10.1016/J.CONCOG.2015.02.011
关键词:
摘要: Previous studies provided contradicting results regarding metacognitive sensitivity estimated from subjective reports of confidence in comparison to visual experience. We investigated whether this effect content is influenced by the statistical method quantify sensitivity. Comparing logistic regression and meta-d a masked orientation task, shape random-dot motion we observed decisional was greater than about experience irrespective mathematical procedures. However, relationship between transform accuracy often not linear, implying that consistent measure argue science consciousness would benefit assessment both confidence, recommend as for future studies.