Demand-led and poverty-oriented ... Or just subcontracted and efficient? Learning from (semi-) privatized technology transfer programmes in Chile

作者: Anthony Bebbington , Octavio Sotomayor

DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199801)10:1<17::AID-JID427>3.0.CO;2-I

关键词:

摘要: In the search for alternatives to state-managed agricultural research and extension, there has been much interest in assessing pros cons of, mechanisms for, varying forms of private sector involvement. One experience privatization that received attention Chile, which most privatized market-oriented national system technology transfer Latin America. This paper suggests this Chilean reveals both advantages also limits voucher contract-based rural services, demonstrates continues be an important role state investment co-ordination alongside It is only limited evidence form had a positive impact on farm incomes or enhancing extent services are demand led. The notes have very special circumstances Chile helped consolidate model. Attempts model elsewhere ought therefore made with caution. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

参考文章(1)
Christopher M. Edmonds, THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM PARTICIPATION ON SMALL FARMS IN CHILE 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN. ,(1999)