Science should drive the bus of clinical description; but how does "science take the wheel"?: a commentary on Markon.
作者： Allan R. Harkness , Scott O. Lilienfeld
DOI: 10.1521/PEDI.2013.27.5.580
关键词:
摘要: In our view, Kristian Markon is right: Science should drive the bus. The central argument of Markon’s scholarly, closely reasoned, timely, and much needed article that clinical description be built bottom-up from sound science, not constructed top-down by authority. We absolutely agree with him science bus, just a slogan on side also why bus: Real offers “competitive epistemological pluralism” (Markon, 2013).
sci-hub.se 参考文章(24)
Keith E. Stanovich, How to think straight about psychology ,(1985)
Edward Osborne Wilson, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge ,(1998)
Karl R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge ,(2014)
Lee J. Cronbach, Paul E. Meehl, Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 52, pp. 281- 302 ,(1955) , 10.1037/H0040957
Allan R. Harkness, Shannon M. Reynolds, Scott O. Lilienfeld, A Review of Systems for Psychology and Psychiatry: Adaptive Systems, Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5), and the DSM–5 Journal of Personality Assessment. ,vol. 96, pp. 121- 139 ,(2014) , 10.1080/00223891.2013.823438
Scott O. Lilienfeld, DSM-5: Centripetal Scientific and Centrifugal Antiscientific Forces Clinical Psychology-science and Practice. ,vol. 21, pp. 269- 279 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CPSP.12075
James Phillips, Allen Frances, Michael A Cerullo, John Chardavoyne, Hannah S Decker, Michael B First, Nassir Ghaemi, Gary Greenberg, Andrew C Hinderliter, Warren A Kinghorn, Steven G LoBello, Elliott B Martin, Aaron L Mishara, Joel Paris, Joseph M Pierre, Ronald W Pies, Harold A Pincus, Douglas Porter, Claire Pouncey, Michael A Schwartz, Thomas Szasz, Jerome C Wakefield, G Scott Waterman, Owen Whooley, Peter Zachar, The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: a pluralogue part 1: conceptual and definitional issues in psychiatric diagnosis Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. ,vol. 7, pp. 3- 3 ,(2012) , 10.1186/1747-5341-7-3
Paul E. Meehl, Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. ,vol. 46, pp. 806- 834 ,(1978) , 10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806
Allan R. Harkness, John L. McNulty, Yossef S. Ben-Porath, The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 Scales. Psychological Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 104- 114 ,(1995) , 10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.104
Paul A. Arbisi, Introduction to the Special Section on the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5) and DSM–5 Trait Dimensional Diagnostic Systems for Personality Disorders: Emerging Convergence Journal of Personality Assessment. ,vol. 96, pp. 117- 120 ,(2014) , 10.1080/00223891.2013.866571