作者: Manwa L. Ng , Chui-Ling I. Kwok , Sau-Fong W. Chow
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80013-6
关键词:
摘要: Summary The purpose of the present study was to compare speech performance four types alaryngeal phonation-electrolaryngeal (EL), pneumatic artificial laryngeal (PA), tracheoesophageal (TE), and standard esophageal (SE) speech-by adult Cantonese-speaking laryngectomees. Subjective ratings (1) voice quality, (2) articulation proficiency, (3) quietness speech, (4) pitch variability, (5) overall intelligibility were given by eight naive individuals who had no prior experience with any form speech. Results indicated that SE TE perceived be more hoarse than PA EL associated significantly less speakers produced least amount noise. However, proficiency found comparable in all speakers.