Cancer risk in women receiving estrogen-progestin replacement therapy.

作者: Ingemar Persson

DOI: 10.1016/0378-5122(96)01010-9

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Objectives and methods: The epidemiological literature was reviewed in order to evaluate the relationship between hormone replacement therapy risk of cancer breast reproductive organs. Results: For cancer, there is no evidence an overall increase risk. According several studies, but not all, duration intake seems affect Many years both estradiol compounds conjugated estrogens can be assumed 1.5-2-fold. addition progestins does seem alter (reduce) duration-risk relationship. magnitude likely small may explained partly by methodological problems, or differences study populations. prognosis patients with HRT-related more favourable than for non-exposed patients. Because importance issue, inconsistencies results, further research urgent. Especially, urgent need define sub-groups women who would susceptible adverse influence HRT. Regarding endometrial a duration-dependent strong long-term only established. level about 10-fold after 10 intake, that decrease discontinuation treatment. Added at least days per cycle reduce eliminate increase. Tumors occurring estrogen have biological characteristics. Future will needed safety various progestin regimens. Ovarian affected Available data are inconsistent contradictory. Due pronounced protective effect oral contraceptives, measure effects estrogen-progestin combined Cervical has been shown Conclusions: It concluded therapy, alone progestins, important on particularly endometrium. Therefore, when making risk-benefit assessment HRT, possible relationships should considered.

参考文章(46)
Noncontraceptive Estrogen Use and the Occurrence of Ovarian Cancer Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 68, pp. 95- 98 ,(1982) , 10.1093/JNCI/68.1.95
C. Paul Yang, Janet R. Daling, Pierre R. Band, Richard P. Gallagher, Emily White, Noel S. Weiss, Noncontraceptive hormone use and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Causes & Control. ,vol. 3, pp. 475- 479 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00051360
Robert Hoover, Catherine Schairer, Hans-Olov Adami, Jonathan Yuen, Ingemar Persson, Leif Bergkvist, Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer mortality in Swedish women: results after adjustment for ‘healthy drug-user’ effect Cancer Causes & Control. ,vol. 4, pp. 369- 374 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF00051340
Paul K. Mills, W. Lawrence Beeson, Roland L. Phillips, Gary E. Fraser, Prospective study of exogenous hormone use and breast cancer in Seventh-day Adventists. Cancer. ,vol. 64, pp. 591- 597 ,(1989) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19890801)64:3<591::AID-CNCR2820640305>3.0.CO;2-U
Graham A. Colditz, Meir J. Stampfer, Walter C. Willett, David J. Hunter, JoAnn E. Manson, Charles H. Hennekens, Bernard A. Rosner, Frank E. Speizer, Type of postmenopausal hormone use and risk of breast cancer: 12-year follow-up from the Nurses' Health Study Cancer Causes & Control. ,vol. 3, pp. 433- 439 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00051356
Barbara S. Hulka, Edison T. Liu, Ruth A. Lininger, Steroid hormones and risk of breast cancer Cancer. ,vol. 74, pp. 1111- 1124 ,(1994) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19940801)74:3+<1111::AID-CNCR2820741520>3.0.CO;2-L
Carlos M. F. Antunes, Paul D. Stolley, Neil B. Rosenshein, Joan L. Davies, James A. Tonascia, Charles Brown, Lonnie Burnett, Ann Rutledge, Merle Pokempner, Rafael Garcia, Endometrial Cancer and Estrogen Use New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 300, pp. 9- 13 ,(1979) , 10.1056/NEJM197901043000103
Jill A. McDonald, Noel S. Weiss, Janet R. Daling, Anita M. Francis, Lincoln Polissar, Menopausal estrogen use and the risk of breast cancer Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. ,vol. 7, pp. 193- 199 ,(1986) , 10.1007/BF01806250
M.P. Vessey, K. Mcpherson, M. Lawless, D. Yeates, NEOPLASIA OF THE CERVIX UTERI AND CONTRACEPTION: A POSSIBLE ADVERSE EFFECT OF THE PILL The Lancet. ,vol. 322, pp. 930- 934 ,(1983) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)90451-8