Factors influencing mutagenic mode of action determinations of regulatory and advisory agencies.

作者: David A. Eastmond

DOI: 10.1016/J.MRREV.2012.04.001

关键词:

摘要: The determination of whether a chemical induces cancer through mutagenic or genotoxic mechanism frequently plays an important role in evaluating the risks associated with low dose exposure. Although various approaches are employed for making mode action decisions, systematic investigation to identify major factors that influence these determinations has not been performed. To accomplish this, over 40 risk assessments conducted by U.S. international regulatory agencies and organizations were reviewed components had played significant role, either directly indirectly, decision-making process. identified included properties agent, its metabolites degradation products; metabolism toxicokinetics; effects seen vivo, particularly target organ; structural metabolic similarities known nonmutagenic chemicals; characteristics tumors induced animal bioassays; origin observed effects. quality data, specific endpoint sensitivity assay conditions toxicity also considerations. In all cases, authoritative groups used weight-of-evidence approach and, most cases where evaluations more than one body, similar conclusions reached. summary, critical evaluation data as well expert judgment is necessary reaching conclusions. These should be made within broader context chemical's overall carcinogenicity.

参考文章(75)
Robert I. Krieger, HANDBOOK OF PESTICIDE TOXICOLOGY : Academic Press. ,(2001)
Anne Steenhout, Inge Mangelsdorf, Peter Calow, Hannu Komulainen, Ole Ladefoged, Jan Linders, Matti Viluksela, Marco Vighi, Wolfgang Dekant, Marco Nuti, Bo Jansson, Helmut Greim, Hanke Wojciech, Colin Janssen, Jose Tarazona, Herman Autrup, Emanuela Testai, Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks opinion on: The revised chapter for Human Health Risk Characterisation of the Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Directive 93/67/EEC on new notified substances and Regulation 1488/94 on existing substances of new and existing substances (Draft of November 2005) Members ot the Working Group of SCHER by alph Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks. ,(2006)
Janet Kielhorn, G Konnecker, Charles Pohlenz-Michel, S Schmidt, Inge Mangelsdorf, World Health Organization, 1.2.3-trichloropropane World Health Organization. ,(2003)
Martha M. Moore, Tao Chen, Mutagenicity of bromate: Implications for cancer risk assessment Toxicology. ,vol. 221, pp. 190- 196 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.TOX.2005.12.018
S.K. Roy, A.K. Thilagar, D.A. Eastmond, Chromosome breakage is primarily responsible for the micronuclei induced by 1,4-dioxane in the bone marrow and liver of young CD-1 mice. Mutation Research-genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. ,vol. 586, pp. 28- 37 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.MRGENTOX.2005.05.007
Götz A. Westphal, Jürgen Bünger, Thomas G. Schulz, Michael M. Müller, Ernst Hallier, Mutagenicity of N-nitrosodiethylamine in the Ames test with S. typhimurium TA1535 is due to volatile metabolites and is not dependent on cytochrome P4502E1 induction. Archives of Toxicology. ,vol. 74, pp. 638- 641 ,(2000) , 10.1007/S002040000175
Maureen R. Gwinn, Douglas O. Johns, Thomas F. Bateson, Kathryn Z. Guyton, A review of the genotoxicity of 1,2-dichloroethane (EDC) Mutation Research-reviews in Mutation Research. ,vol. 727, pp. 42- 53 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.MRREV.2011.01.001
C. Sonich-Mullin, R. Fielder, J. Wiltse, K. Baetcke, J. Dempsey, P. Fenner-Crisp, D. Grant, M. Hartley, A. Knaap, D. Kroese, I. Mangelsdorf, E. Meek, J.M. Rice, M. Younes, IPCS conceptual framework for evaluating a mode of action for chemical carcinogenesis. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. ,vol. 34, pp. 146- 152 ,(2001) , 10.1006/RTPH.2001.1493