作者: Molly Magill , Michael H. Bernstein , Ariel Hoadley , Brian Borsari , Timothy R. Apodaca
DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1490973
关键词:
摘要: Objective: This meta-analysis examines the predictive validity of client change language subtypes in motivational interviewing (MI) sessions addressing addictive behavior change. Method: A systematic review identified k = 13 primary studies, contributing 16 MI conditions (N = 1556). The pooled correlation coefficient was used to assess significance, direction, and strength seven (i.e., reason, desire, need, ability, commitment, taking steps, other) by three valences frequency positive or talk, negative sustain proportion talk) their relationship subsequent engagement behavior. Results: For measures, more talk related other were associated with at follow up. Other outcomes but an unexpected direction behavior). Proportion measures showed talk-reason -other statements less Sensitivity analyses indicated some heterogeneity instability effect sizes, no evidence publication bias. Conclusions: preliminary suggests that aggregate are comprised statement not equally meaningful predicting outcome following for