Do what you say and say what you are going to do: A preliminary meta-analysis of client change and sustain talk subtypes in motivational interviewing.

作者: Molly Magill , Michael H. Bernstein , Ariel Hoadley , Brian Borsari , Timothy R. Apodaca

DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1490973

关键词:

摘要: Objective: This meta-analysis examines the predictive validity of client change language subtypes in motivational interviewing (MI) sessions addressing addictive behavior change. Method: A systematic review identified k = 13 primary studies, contributing 16 MI conditions (N = 1556). The pooled correlation coefficient was used to assess significance, direction, and strength seven (i.e., reason, desire, need, ability, commitment, taking steps, other) by three valences frequency positive or talk, negative sustain proportion talk) their relationship subsequent engagement behavior. Results: For measures, more talk related other were associated with at follow up. Other outcomes but an unexpected direction behavior). Proportion measures showed talk-reason -other statements less Sensitivity analyses indicated some heterogeneity instability effect sizes, no evidence publication bias. Conclusions: preliminary suggests that aggregate are comprised statement not equally meaningful predicting outcome following for

参考文章(56)
Daryl J. Bem, SELF-PERCEPTION THEORY Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 6, pp. 1- 62 ,(1972) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6
Michael Barton Laws, Gary S. Rose, Mary Catherine Beach, Yoojin Lee, William S. Rogers, Alyssa Bianca Velasco, Ira B. Wilson, Patient-provider concordance with behavioral change goals drives measures of motivational interviewing consistency Patient Education and Counseling. ,vol. 98, pp. 728- 733 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.PEC.2015.02.014
William R. Miller, Gary S. Rose, Toward a Theory of Motivational Interviewing American Psychologist. ,vol. 64, pp. 527- 537 ,(2009) , 10.1037/A0016830
Jacques Gaume, Gerhard Gmel, Mohamed Faouzi, Jean-Bernard Daeppen, Counselor skill influences outcomes of brief motivational interventions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. ,vol. 37, pp. 151- 159 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JSAT.2008.12.001
David Moher, Deborah J Cook, Susan Eastwood, Ingram Olkin, Drummond Rennie, Donna F Stroup, Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement The Lancet. ,vol. 354, pp. 1896- 1900 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
Theresa B. Moyers, Tim Martin, Jon M. Houck, Paulette J. Christopher, J. Scott Tonigan, From In-Session Behaviors to Drinking Outcomes: A Causal Chain for Motivational Interviewing Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. ,vol. 77, pp. 1113- 1124 ,(2009) , 10.1037/A0017189
Robert Rosenthal, The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 86, pp. 638- 641 ,(1979) , 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
Paul C. Amrhein, How Does Motivational Interviewing Work? What Client Talk Reveals Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. ,vol. 18, pp. 323- 336 ,(2004) , 10.1891/JCOP.18.4.323.64001
Amanda M. Vader, Scott T. Walters, Gangamma Chenenda Prabhu, Jon M. Houck, Craig A. Field, The language of motivational interviewing and feedback: Counselor language, client language, and client drinking outcomes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. ,vol. 24, pp. 190- 197 ,(2010) , 10.1037/A0018749