Civil Society, Everyday Life and the Possibilities for Development Studies

作者: Sarah Peck

DOI: 10.1111/GEC3.12245

关键词:

摘要: Civil society is one of the most contentious terms in political thought. There considerable, and highly significant, difference between academic debate about meaning ‘civil society’ way term mobilized international development discourse. In particular, narratives civil are often dominated by reference to organizational descriptions measurability. But I would like suggest here that should be reclaimed as a giving stories everyday lives people who create, shape embody society. Used this way, idea can understood intersecting emotions, discourses practices add body scholarly work nurtures values life lens through which view wider social processes. Paying attention may have implications for engaged with academically, also has potential refresh how thought practice.

参考文章(100)
Susie Scott, Making Sense of Everyday Life ,(2009)
Daniella Kuzmanovic, Refractions of Civil Society in Turkey ,(2012)
Lorenza B. Fontana, Jean Grugel, To Eradicate or to Legalize? Child Labor Debates and ILO Convention 182 in Bolivia Global Governance. ,vol. 21, pp. 61- 78 ,(2015) , 10.1163/19426720-02101006
Michael Rustin, Spatial Relations and Human Relations John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 56- 69 ,(2012) , 10.1002/9781118278857.CH4
Mark Jayne, Gill Valentine, Sarah L Holloway, Emotional, embodied and affective geographies of alcohol, drinking and drunkenness Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. ,vol. 35, pp. 540- 554 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1475-5661.2010.00401.X