The implications of the `New Insurance Contract' for UK pension provision: rights, responsibilities and risks

作者: Patrick Ring

DOI: 10.1177/02610183020220040101

关键词:

摘要: The government, in its 1998 pensions Green Paper, has set out to establish a `New Insurance Contract'. It promises security retirement for those who cannot afford provide themselves and strengthened private framework can. In return, it expects individuals, wherever possible, their own retirement. This article argues that the promised amounts little more than greater means testing complexity, government's `strengthening' of actually results risk being transferred individual savers. government recognizes some problems this approach creates, but attempts remedy them are not very credible. Nevertheless, will continue on path because determination reduce state's role pension provision. suggests Contract' is one savers do fully understand may ultimately reject.

参考文章(8)
Tom Clark, Recent pensions policy and the Pension Credit Institute for Fiscal Studies. ,(2001) , 10.1920/BN.IFS.2001.0017
Debbie Harrison, Stakeholder pensions : sink or swim? LLP Professional Publishing. ,(2000)
Richard Disney, Carl Emmerson, Sarah Tanner, Partnership in pensions: an assessment Institute for Fiscal Studies. ,(1999) , 10.1920/CO.IFS.1999.0078
Patrick Ring, Education, advice, and the Financial Services Authority's statutory objective Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. ,vol. 8, pp. 333- 343 ,(2000) , 10.1108/EB025054
D. Blake, R. Hudson, Improving Security and Flexibility in Retirement: Full Technical Report Retirement Income Working Party. ,(2000)
David P. Blake, Robert Hudson, Improving Security and Flexibility in Retirement Social Science Research Network. ,(2000) , 10.2139/SSRN.3610373
Andrew Dilnot, Paul Johnson, Edward Whitehouse, Richard Disney, Pensions policy in the UK: An economic analysis Research Papers in Economics. ,(1994)