Participants who were difficult to recruit at baseline are less likely to complete a follow-up questionnaire - results from the German National Cohort.

作者: Stefan Rach , Kathrin Günther , Birte Hadeler

DOI: 10.1186/S12874-020-01073-0

关键词:

摘要: With declining response proportions in population-based research the importance of evaluating effectiveness measures aimed at improving increases. We investigated whether an additional flyer with information about study influences participation a follow-up questionnaire and time participants take to send back filled questionnaire. In trial embedded within German National Cohort we compared responses invitations for either including cohort or not it. Outcomes interest were (yes vs. no) (in days). analyzed paradata from baseline recruitment account differences history between participants. Adding did neither influence likelihood (OR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.11), nor it took return completed questionnaires (β = 1.71, − 1.01, 4.44). Subjects who, baseline, needed be reminded before eventually participating examinations subjects who scheduled three more appointments until completing less likely complete and, if they did, questionnaires. Evaluating increasing can help improve allocation usually limited resources. Characteristics studies therefore (i.e., paradata) might prove useful tailor recruitments those difficult recruit during baseline. To this end, however, is necessary routinely meticulously collect recruitment.

参考文章(26)
Peter Lynn, Methods for Longitudinal Surveys John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 1- 19 ,(2009) , 10.1002/9780470743874.CH1
Philip James Edwards, Ian Roberts, Mike J Clarke, Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Reinhard Wentz, Irene Kwan, Rachel Cooper, Lambert M Felix, Sarah Pratap, Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 3, ,(2009) , 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.PUB4
Joseph Studer, Stéphanie Baggio, Meichun Mohler-Kuo, Petra Dermota, Jacques Gaume, Nicolas Bertholet, Jean-Bernard Daeppen, Gerhard Gmel, Examining non-response bias in substance use research--are late respondents proxies for non-respondents? Drug and Alcohol Dependence. ,vol. 132, pp. 316- 323 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2013.02.029
Volker Winkler, Michael Leitzmann, Nadia Obi, Wolfgang Ahrens, Thomas Edinger, Guido Giani, Jakob Linseisen, Markus Löffler, Karin Michels, Ute Nöthlings, Sabine Schipf, Alexander Kluttig, H.-Erich Wichmann, Barbara Hoffmann, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Heiko Becher, Response in individuals with and without foreign background and application to the National Cohort in Germany: which factors have an effect? International Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 59, pp. 555- 563 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S00038-013-0539-1
Sandro Galea, Melissa Tracy, Participation Rates in Epidemiologic Studies Annals of Epidemiology. ,vol. 17, pp. 643- 653 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.ANNEPIDEM.2007.03.013
Lindsay M. Morton, Jack Cahill, Patricia Hartge, Reporting Participation in Epidemiologic Studies: A Survey of Practice American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 163, pp. 197- 203 ,(2006) , 10.1093/AJE/KWJ036
Brett Maclennan, Kypros Kypri, John Langley, Robin Room, Non-response bias in a community survey of drinking, alcohol-related experiences and public opinion on alcohol policy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. ,vol. 126, pp. 189- 194 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2012.05.014
Robert M. Groves, Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys Public Opinion Quarterly. ,vol. 70, pp. 646- 675 ,(2006) , 10.1093/POQ/NFL033
A. Stang, S. Moebus, N. Dragano, E. M. Beck, S. Möhlenkamp, A. Schmermund, J. Siegrist, R. Erbel, K. H. Jöckel, Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf recall study: Identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response European Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 20, pp. 489- 496 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S10654-005-5529-Z