The Accountability of the British Nationalized Industries.

作者: Eldon L. Johnson

DOI: 10.2307/1951201

关键词:

摘要: Great Britain's giant nationalized industries pose unprecedented problems for a free nation. Are the old governmental forms appropriate? Can new be held accountable to public? public accountability and business efficiency reconciled? The five key industries, formed out of thousands former enterprises, employ almost two million workers—almost three times number civil servants. Even strictly “business†are unprecedented. In personnel, transport industry is double size American Telephone Telegraph. Coal General Motors. Admitting that final answers on had not been found, Herbert Morrison, then Lord President Council, well stated prevailing British attitude: “We in early years novel constitutional social experiments great long-term significance, we can certain as experience grows methods which use at present will need modified additional evolved.â€

参考文章(7)
P. Sargant Florence, H. Maddick, CONSUMERS' COUNCILS IN THE NATIONALIZED INDUSTRIES The Political Quarterly. ,vol. 24, pp. 259- 271 ,(1953) , 10.1111/J.1467-923X.1953.TB00279.X
Frank Milligan, Ministerial Control of the British Nationalized Industries The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science. ,vol. 17, pp. 164- ,(1951) , 10.2307/137778
Eldon L. Johnson, Joint Consultation in Britain's Nationalized Industries Public Administration Review. ,vol. 12, pp. 181- ,(1952) , 10.2307/972996
Charles Winter, Parliamentary, Ministerial, and Judicial Control of Nationalized Industries in Great Britain Law and contemporary problems. ,vol. 16, pp. 670- 701 ,(1951) , 10.2307/1189982
Eldon L. Johnson, Consumer "Control" In British Nationalized Industries The Journal of Politics. ,vol. 15, pp. 88- 113 ,(1953) , 10.2307/2126194
Herbert Morrison, Public Control of the Socialised Industries Public Administration. ,vol. 28, pp. 3- 9 ,(1950) , 10.1111/J.1467-9299.1950.TB02716.X
J. H. Smith, T. E. Chester, The Distribution of Power in Nationalized Industries British Journal of Sociology. ,vol. 2, pp. 275- ,(1951) , 10.2307/588082