Democracy’s Denominator Reassessing Responsiveness with Public Opinion on the National Policy Agenda

作者: Jason Barabas

DOI: 10.1093/POQ/NFV082

关键词:

摘要: Democratic responsiveness concerns the degree to which government policies match public preferences. Responsiveness studies typically use national surveys characterize opinion, but whether poll questions overlap with policy agenda is unknown. The first of two empirical analyses presented here, hundreds issues on in United States from 1947 2000, reveals that opinion mostly unrelated outcomes. picture appears be even more ominous—that is, and are negatively related—on highly salient attract media attention. A second study revisiting published work confirms patterns look different depending upon opinion-policy connections (a) begin survey data then examine developments, or (b) legislative data. Thus, conclusions about democratic depend examined, often do not include tangible options. In sense, future changes might go undetected because scholars lack what goes into denominator democracy.

参考文章(69)
Peter K. Enns, Christopher Wlezien, Who Gets Represented Russell Sage Foundation. ,(2011)
James Stimson, Public Opinion in America ,(1991)
Daniel Stevens, Public Opinion and Public Policy: The Case of Kennedy and Civil Rights. (Articles) Presidential Studies Quarterly. ,vol. 32, pp. 111- 136 ,(2002) , 10.1111/J.1741-5705.2002.TB00016.X
Christopher Wlezien, Stuart Neil Soroka, Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy ,(2009)
Lawrence R. Jacobs, Benjamin I. Page, Class War?: What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality ,(2009)
James A. Stimson, Christopher Ellis, Ideology in America ,(2012)
Michael B. Mackuen, James A. Stimson, Robert S. Erikson, The Macro Polity ,(2001)