作者: Lonneke Poort , Tora Holmberg , Malin Ideland
关键词:
摘要: Human/animal relations are potentially controversial and biotechnologically produced animals animal-like creatures – bio-objects such as transgenics, clones, cybrids other hybrids have often created lively political debate since they challenge established social moral norms. Ethical issues regarding the human/animal in biotechnological developments at times been widely debated many European countries beyond. However, general trend is a move away from parliamentary public towards institutionalized ethics technified expert panels. We explore by using conceptual lens of bio-objectification what effects can be said to have. In process, unstable bio-object becomes stabilized receives single “bio-identity” closing debate. we argue that there possible routes processes take, allow for more open-ended cases. By comparing our observations analyses deliberations three different will how process works context animal committees. From this comparison found an interesting common feature: When biotechnology discussed committees, technical pragmatic matters foregrounded. noticed silence around striking consensus culture. The present paper, seeks understand so complexity through well discuss ethical involved could become re-politicized, thereby made pluralistic, “ethos controversies”.