Bio-objects' political capacity: a research agenda.
作者： Pieter Maeseele , Kim Hendrickx , Vincenzo Pavone , Ine Van Hoyweghen
关键词:
摘要: This article explores the merits of foregrounding dichotomy politicization vs de-politicization for our understanding bio-objects in order to study their production, circulation, and governance European societies. By asking how are configured science, policy, public, media discourses practices, we focus on role socio-technical configurations generating political relations. The bio-object thereby serves as an entry point approach conceptualize “the political” innovative way.
core.ac.uk
mefst.hr 参考文章(9)
Anthony Giddens, Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics ,(1994)
Kim Hendrickx, Bart Penders, Food safety body is bound to draw fire Nature. ,vol. 485, pp. 582- 582 ,(2012) , 10.1038/485582D
Kaushik Sunder Rajan, Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life ,(2006)
Gerard de Vries, What is Political in Sub-politics?: How Aristotle Might Help STS Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 37, pp. 781- 809 ,(2007) , 10.1177/0306312706070749
Rebecca Boden, Debbie Epstein, Joanna Latimer, Accounting for Ethos or Programmes for Conduct? The Brave New World of Research Ethics Committees The Sociological Review. ,vol. 57, pp. 727- 749 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1467-954X.2009.01869.X
Gísli Pálsson, Biosocial Relations of Production Comparative Studies in Society and History. ,vol. 51, pp. 288- 313 ,(2009) , 10.1017/S0010417509000139
Ine Van Hoyweghen, Klasien Horstman, Evidence-based underwriting in the molecular age: the politics of reinsurance companies towards the genetics issue New Genetics and Society. ,vol. 28, pp. 317- 337 ,(2009) , 10.1080/14636770903314483
Pieter A. Maeseele, Science journalism and social debate on modernization risks Journal of Science Communication. ,vol. 09, pp. C02- 5 ,(2010) , 10.22323/2.09040302
David Demortain, Standards of Scientific Advice. Scientific Advice to Policy Making. pp. 141- 160 ,(2009) , 10.2307/J.CTVDF00CM.9