Digital health fiduciaries: protecting user privacy when sharing health data

作者: Chirag Arora

DOI: 10.1007/S10676-019-09499-X

关键词:

摘要: Wearable self-tracking devices capture multidimensional health data and offer several advantages including new ways of facilitating research. However, they also create a conflict between individual interests avoiding privacy harms, collective assembling using large sets for public benefits. While some scholars argue transparency accountability mechanisms to resolve this conflict, an average user is not adequately equipped access process information relating the consequences consenting further uses her data. As alternative, paper argues fiduciary relationships, which put deliberative demands on digital controllers keep their subjects at forefront as well cater contextual nature privacy. These requirements ensure that users can engage in participation share lower risk harms. This proposes way balance flexible open-ended law with specific scope duties should owe subjects.

参考文章(32)
Jane Yakowitz, Tragedy of the Data Commons Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. ,vol. 25, pp. 1- ,(2011)
Lorrie Faith Cranor, Alyssa Au, Pedro Giovanni Leon, Candice Hoke, Are They Worth Reading? An In-Depth Analysis of Online Trackers’ Privacy Policies I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society. ,(2015)
Maxwell J. Mehlman, Why Physicians Are Fiduciaries For Their Patients Indiana Health Law Review. ,vol. 12, pp. 1- 64 ,(2015) , 10.18060/18959
CDJ Holman, AJ Bass, DL Rosman, MB Smith, JB Semmens, EJ Glasson, EL Brook, B Trutwein, IL Rouse, CR Watson, NH de Klerk, FJ Stanley, A decade of data linkage in Western Australia: strategic design, applications and benefits of the WA data linkage system Australian Health Review. ,vol. 32, pp. 766- 777 ,(2008) , 10.1071/AH080766
Alessandro Acquisti, Idris Adjerid, Laura Brandimarte, Gone in 15 Seconds: The Limits of Privacy Transparency and Control ieee symposium on security and privacy. ,vol. 11, pp. 72- 74 ,(2013) , 10.1109/MSP.2013.86
Idris Adjerid, Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, George Loewenstein, Sleights of privacy: framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency symposium on usable privacy and security. pp. 9- ,(2013) , 10.1145/2501604.2501613
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, PROSPECT THEORY: AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK Econometrica. ,vol. 47, pp. 263- 291 ,(1979) , 10.1017/CBO9780511609220.014
Harold Abelson, Ross Anderson, Steven M. Bellovin, Josh Benaloh, Matt Blaze, Whitfield Diffie, John Gilmore, Matthew Green, Susan Landau, Peter G. Neumann, Ronald L. Rivest, Jeffrey I. Schiller, Bruce Schneier, Michael A. Specter, Daniel J. Weitzner, Keys under doormats: mandating insecurity by requiring government access to all data and communications Journal of Cybersecurity. ,vol. 1, pp. 69- 79 ,(2015) , 10.1093/CYBSEC/TYV009
Helen M. Farrell, Transparency in psychiatric care. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. ,vol. 5, pp. 273- 274 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.AJP.2012.07.011
Carlos Jensen, Colin Potts, Privacy policies as decision-making tools: an evaluation of online privacy notices human factors in computing systems. pp. 471- 478 ,(2004) , 10.1145/985692.985752