The Impact of Dark Adaptation on Photoscreening

作者: Altuğ Çetinkaya , Sibel Oto , Pınar Aydın

DOI: 10.1067/MPA.2002.128209

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Purpose: Some previous studies have used different dark adaptation periods to achieve adequate pupil dilation for photo refraction. Because efficient use of time is important in screening programs, we investigated how affects the quality eye photographs. Methods: This prospective study was done on 2 groups. In first group (40 patients), 1 horizontal flash and vertical photograph were taken as soon room lights turned off, a second set photographs after 10 minutes adaptation. (37 sets 1, 5, 15 Pupillary diameters measured by an observer who masked timing The findings compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test Student t paired data. Results: Compared with results at minute, mean pupillary diameter significantly decreased adaptation, both (Z = -4.723; P Conclusion: indicated that not prerequisite photoscreening, that, fact, it might adverse effect diameter. (J AAPOS 2002;6:315-8)

参考文章(14)
Charlene Hsu-Winges, Anthony M Norcia, Russell D Hamer, Derf Lewis, Gunilla Haegerstrom-Portnoy, Susan H Day, Comparison of on- and off-axis photorefraction with cycloplegic retinoscopy in infants. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. ,vol. 29, pp. 232- 239 ,(1992) , 10.3928/0191-3913-19920701-11
Wanda L Ottar, William E Scott, Sandra I Holgado, Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. ,vol. 32, pp. 289- 295 ,(1995) , 10.3928/0191-3913-19950901-06
A B Fulton, R M Hansen, Pupillary changes during dark adaptation in human infants. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 27, pp. 1726- 1729 ,(1986)
Howard L. Freedman, Karen L. Preston, Polaroid photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. An improved methodology. Ophthalmology. ,vol. 99, pp. 1785- 1795 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31722-1
Irene E. Loewenfeld, Otto Lowenstein, The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications ,(1999)
Rainer Hans Straub, Ulrich Thies, Lothar Kerp, The Pupillary Light Reflex Ophthalmologica. ,vol. 204, pp. 134- 142 ,(1992) , 10.1159/000310282
ISRAEL ABRAMOV, LOUISE HAINLINE, ROBERT H. DUCKMAN, Screening infant vision with paraxial photorefraction. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 67, pp. 538- 545 ,(1990) , 10.1097/00006324-199007000-00012
STANLEY W. HATCH, CARRIE D. TIBBLES, IRENE R. MESTITO, RACHEL READ, LISA TRAVEIS, JACK RICHMAN, Validity and reliability of the MTI photoscreener. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 74, pp. 859- 864 ,(1997) , 10.1097/00006324-199710000-00025
K. S. Morgan, W. D. Johnson, Clinical Evaluation of a Commercial Photorefractor Archives of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 105, pp. 1528- 1531 ,(1987) , 10.1001/ARCHOPHT.1987.01060110074035