No difference in clinical outcome between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKA: a meta-analysis.

作者: Yu-Lin Li , Qiang Wu , Guang-Zhi Ning , Shi-Qing Feng , Qiu-Li Wu

DOI: 10.1007/S00167-012-2313-Y

关键词:

摘要: To compare the clinical and radiographic results of fixed-bearing mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register Controlled Trials, Google Scholar databases from 1966 to January 2012. No language restriction was applied. Reference lists all selected articles were hand-searched for any additional trials. Trial quality assessed using modified Jadad scale. Two authors independently extracted data eligible studies, including study design, participants, interventions, outcomes (Knee Society Score, range movement, radiolucent line, patient preference, walking support, pain score, complications). The fixed-effects or random-effects models with mean differences risk ratios continuous dichotomous variables, respectively. A 24 studies involving 2,799 patients identified in this analysis. Meta-analysis showed lower score (OR, 0.66, 95 % CI 0.46, 0.94) TKA than TKA. There no significant difference between two treatment groups regarding Knee Score (SMD, −0.17, CI: −0.60, 0.26), movement −0.05, −0.63, 0.53), line 1.03, 0.74, 1.44), preference 1.15, 0.82, 1.61), support 1.07, 0.68, 1.70), complications 0.85, 0.59, 1.21). available evidence suggested that there except score. Regarding relevance, less incidence could be advantage selecting II.

参考文章(38)
J Goodfellow, J O'Connor, The Mechanics of the Knee and Prosthesis Design Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume. pp. 358- 369 ,(1978) , 10.1302/0301-620X.60B3.581081
Ulrik Hansson, Sören Toksvig-Larsen, Lars Peter Jorn, Leif Ryd, Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement: a randomised radiostereometric study. Knee. ,vol. 12, pp. 414- 418 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.KNEE.2004.12.002
F. F. Buechel, M. J. Pappas, Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 260, pp. 162- 169 ,(1990) , 10.1097/00003086-199011000-00027
Yu Wen, Da Liu, Ying Huang, Bin Li, A meta-analysis of the fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. ,vol. 131, pp. 1341- 1350 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S00402-011-1328-Z
Masahiro Hasegawa, Akihiro Sudo, Atsumasa Uchida, Staged bilateral mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty in the same patients: a prospective comparison of a posterior-stabilized prosthesis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. ,vol. 17, pp. 237- 243 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S00167-008-0662-3
W. C. H. Jacobs, B. Christen, A. B. Wymenga, A. Schuster, D. B. van der Schaaf, A. ten Ham, U. Wehrli, Functional performance of mobile versus fixed bearing total knee prostheses: a randomised controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. ,vol. 20, pp. 1450- 1455 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00167-011-1684-9
Hiroshi Higuchi, Kazuhisa Hatayama, Masaki Shimizu, Atsushi Kobayashi, Tsutomu Kobayashi, Kenji Takagishi, Relationship between joint gap difference and range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study between different platforms International Orthopaedics. ,vol. 33, pp. 997- 1000 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S00264-009-0772-7
Melvyn A. Harrington, William J. Hopkinson, Patricia Hsu, Leslie Manion, Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: does it make a difference?--a prospective randomized study. Journal of Arthroplasty. ,vol. 24, pp. 24- 27 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ARTH.2009.04.031
Akram Jawed, Vijay Kumar, R. Malhotra, C. S. Yadav, S. Bhan, A comparative analysis between fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty (PFC Sigma) and rotating platform total knee arthroplasty (PFC-RP) with minimum 3-year follow-up. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. ,vol. 132, pp. 875- 881 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00402-012-1482-Y