Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.

作者: Richard M. Felder , Linda K. Silverman

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: When Linda Silverman and I wrote this paper in 1987, our goal was to offer some insights about teaching learning based on Dr. Silverman’s expertise educational psychology my experience engineering education that would be helpful of fellow professors. the published early 1988, response astonishing. Almost immediately, reprint requests flooded from all over world. The started cited literature, then general science literature; it first article premier issue ERIC’s National Teaching Learning Forum; most frequently articles Journal Engineering Education a 10-year period. A self-scoring web-based instrument called Index Styles assesses preferences four scales style model developed currently gets 100,000 hits year has been translated into half dozen languages know probably more don’t, even though not yet validated. 1988 is still than any other have written, including recent papers styles.

参考文章(14)
Richard M. Felder, Creativity in Engineering Education. Chemical engineering education. ,vol. 22, ,(1988)
Rita Dunn, Learning Style Researchers Define Differences Differently. Educational Leadership. ,vol. 38, ,(1981)
Stephen Garger, Pat Burke Guild, Marching to Different Drummers ,(1985)
Michael N. Milone, Raymond H. Swassing, Walter Burke Barbe, Teaching Through Modality Strengths: Concepts and Practices ,(1979)
Rita Dunn, Marie Carbo, Modalities: An Open Letter to Walter Barbe, Michael Milone, and Raymond Swassing. Educational Leadership. ,vol. 38, ,(1981)
Michael N. Milone, Walter B. Barbe, What We Know about Modality Strengths. Educational Leadership. ,vol. 38, ,(1981)
Michael N. Milone, Walter B. Barbe, Modality Strengths: A Reply to Dunn and Carbo. Educational Leadership. ,vol. 38, pp. 489- ,(1981)
Richard M. Felder, ON CREATING CREATIVE ENGINEERS Engineering Education. ,vol. 77, ,(1987)