Open systems evaluation and the logic model: Program planning and evaluation tools

作者: David A. Julian , Ann Jones , Diana Deyo

DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(95)00034-8

关键词:

摘要: This paper describes two case management projects and efforts to evaluate outcomes. Lessons learned from the first effort suggest that a tool referred to as the logic model and a particular approach to evaluation called the “open systems” model might be useful to planners and program evaluators. The logic model provides a means of presenting conditions a program is intended to address, activities that constitute a program, short term outcomes resulting from program activities and long term impacts. The open systems …

参考文章(9)
Louis G. Tornatzky, Elmima C. Johnson, Research on implementation Evaluation and Program Planning. ,vol. 5, pp. 193- 198 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90069-6
David A. Julian, Thomas S. Lyons, A strategic planning model for human services Evaluation and Program Planning. ,vol. 15, pp. 247- 254 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0149-7189(92)90088-C
David S. Cordray, Michael Quinn Patton, Qualitative evaluation methods Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. ,vol. 3, pp. 98- ,(1981) , 10.2307/1164029
Stephen G. West, Leona S. Aiken, Michael Todd, Probing the Effects of Individual Components in Multiple Component Prevention Programs American Journal of Community Psychology. ,vol. 21, pp. 571- 605 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF00942173
Walter Broughton, Qualitative methods in program evaluation. American Journal of Health Promotion. ,vol. 5, pp. 461- 465 ,(1991) , 10.4278/0890-1171-5.6.461
Julian Rappaport, Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. American Psychological Association. ,(1990) , 10.1037/10073-005