Symposium De toekomst van de informele zorg

作者: Marjolein Broese van Groenou , Alice de Boer , Kim Putters , Kène Henkens , Henk Nies

DOI: 10.1007/S12439-017-0208-6

关键词:

摘要: Due to the reform of long term care in 2015, there is growing concern about whether groups at risk receive they need. People need have rely more on help from their social network. The increased for informal requires resilience and organizational skills families, but also volunteers, professionals employers. What does this mean provision next decennia? symposium ‘The future care’, organized January 26 2017 by National Institute Social Research Societal Resilience Vrije Universiteit, addressed possible answers question. In her inaugural speech Alice de Boer discussed inequality as determinant outcome care. Some conclusions: Until 2050 absolute number 75-plus doubled 3 million persons, caregivers will decrease. addition importance economic resources (the ‘have & have-nots’), ability arrange ‘can can-nots’) gains importance. Almost half older employers provides just before retirement. Flexibility working hours work location facilitates combining care, indicates that partial retirement home are no options. Informal often provide comparable perspectives identities. Addressing similarities rather than differences improves chances collaboration. adult children providing household parents between 2002 2014. This suggests an increase family solidarity, current policies may gender caregiving families. Spouses remain primary future, preferably supported many different types caregivers. Not everybody has capabilities organize direct such a large Providing increases overburden absence or education. remain, women, spouses, migrants, younger carers.

参考文章(21)
Pierre Gobet, Thomas Emilsson, Integration as “Boundary Redefinition Process” International Journal of Integrated Care. ,vol. 13, pp. 118- 139 ,(2013) , 10.1057/9781137032348_6
Claudia Maria Van der Heijde, Peter Vonk, Frans J. Meijman, Self-regulation for the promotion of student health. Traffic lights: the development of a tailored web-based instrument providing immediate personalized feedback Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine. ,vol. 3, pp. 169- 189 ,(2015) , 10.1080/21642850.2015.1049950
NIELS SCHENK, PEARL DYKSTRA, INEKE MAAS, RUBEN VAN GAALEN, Older adults’ networks and public care receipt: Do partners and adult children substitute for unskilled public care? Ageing & Society. ,vol. 34, pp. 1711- 1729 ,(2014) , 10.1017/S0144686X13000469
Jana Javornik, Measuring state de-familialism: Contesting post-socialist exceptionalism Journal of European Social Policy. ,vol. 24, pp. 240- 257 ,(2014) , 10.1177/0958928714525815
M. Brandt, K. Haberkern, M. Szydlik, Intergenerational Help and Care in Europe European Sociological Review. ,vol. 25, pp. 585- 601 ,(2009) , 10.1093/ESR/JCN076
Chiara Saraceno, Social inequalities in facing old-age dependency: a bi-generational perspective Journal of European Social Policy. ,vol. 20, pp. 32- 44 ,(2010) , 10.1177/0958928709352540
B. Beersma, De kracht van coöperatie Management en Organisatie. pp. 5- 6 ,(2015)
Suzan van der Pas, Theo van Tilburg, Kees Knipscheer, Changes in Contact and Support Within Intergenerational Relationships in the Netherlands: a Cohort and Time-Sequential Perspective Advances in Life Course Research. ,vol. 12, pp. 243- 274 ,(2007) , 10.1016/S1040-2608(07)12009-8
Kai Leichsenring, Lis Wagner, Jenny R. Billings, Addressing Long-Term Care as a System Palgrave Macmillan. ,(2013)