Forging convictions: the effects of active participation in a clinical trial.

作者: Clare Scott , Jan Walker , Peter White , George Lewith

DOI: 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2011.04.021

关键词:

摘要: This qualitative study explored non-specific influences on participation in, and outcomes of, a randomised controlled trial. It was nested within single-blind clinical trial of western acupuncture which compared real with two types placebo control administered to National Health Service (NHS) patients awaiting hip knee replacement surgery in England. Data collection (2004–2008) based narrative-style interviews participant observation. The results indicate that recruitment retention depend set convictions forged largely as result contextual factors peripheral the intervention, including friendliness helpfulness research centre staff status administering practitioner. These also influence reporting outcomes, particularly if participants experience uncertainties when choosing an appropriate response. findings suggest trials are actively involved shaping process, rather than passive recipients treatment. Thus trials, notably those involving contact interventions, should be regarded not matters fact, but products complex environmental, social, interpretive biological processes. In this paper, we develop present ‘theory active participation’ offers framework for understanding impact processes trials.

参考文章(71)
Sue Ross, Adrian Grant, Carl Counsell, William Gillespie, Ian Russell, Robin Prescott, Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 52, pp. 1143- 1156 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00141-9
Alison M McDonald, Rosemary C Knight, Marion K Campbell, Vikki A Entwistle, Adrian M Grant, Jonathan A Cook, Diana R Elbourne, David Francis, Jo Garcia, Ian Roberts, Claire Snowdon, None, What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. ,vol. 7, pp. 9- 9 ,(2006) , 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
Jennifer M Rendell, Rowena K Merritt, John Geddes, Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 2007, ,(2007) , 10.1002/14651858.MR000021.PUB3
Barney G. Glaser, Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory The International Journal of Qualitative Methods. ,vol. 1, pp. 23- 38 ,(2002) , 10.1177/160940690200100203
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Peter C Gøtzsche, Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 2010, ,(2010) , 10.1002/14651858.CD003974.PUB3
Krysia Dziedzic, Peter R Croft, Elaine M Hay, Elaine Thomas, Susan M Paterson, What influences participants' treatment preference and can it influence outcome? Results from a primary care-based randomised trial for shoulder pain. British Journal of General Practice. ,vol. 54, pp. 93- 96 ,(2004)
Larry E. Miller, Morgan E. Stewart, The blind leading the blind: use and misuse of blinding in randomized controlled trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials. ,vol. 32, pp. 240- 243 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.CCT.2010.11.004
Marlene Fransen, Jack Crosbie, John Edmonds, Physical therapy is effective for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled clinical trial. The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 28, pp. 156- 164 ,(2001)
Helen Lambert, Accounting for EBM: notions of evidence in medicine. Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 62, pp. 2633- 2645 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2005.11.023