Dose-volume modeling of salivary function in patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving radiotherapy.

作者: Angel I. Blanco , K.S. Clifford Chao , Issam El Naqa , Gregg E. Franklin , Konstantin Zakarian

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJROBP.2004.12.076

关键词:

摘要: Purpose: We investigated the factors that affect salivary function after head-and-neck radiotherapy (RT), including parotid gland dose-volume effects, potential compensation by less-irradiated tissue, and functional recovery over time. Methods Materials: Sixty-five patients with tumors were enrolled in a prospective study. RT was delivered using intensity-modulated ( n = 45), forward-planning three-dimensional conformal 14), or an boost 6). Whole flow measured before therapy at 6 months 61) 12 31) RT. A wide variety of models to predict post-RT tested. Xerostomia defined according subjective, objective, management, analytic (SOMA) criteria as occurring when posttreatment Results: significant correlation observed between relative quality-of-life scores stimulated saliva values (Spearman's coefficient [R s ] 0.46, p (−A × mean dose), equal 0.054/Gy (68% confidence interval 0.052–0.059), provided good representation data incorporated into our multimetric analysis. Using model, we estimated dose 25.8 Gy, on average, likely reduce single gland's 25% its pretreatment value, regardless treatment delivery method. Significant correlations logistic multivariate model (incorporating dose-exponential equation, gender, Karnofsky performance status) (R 0.73), 0.54), score 0.35) Conclusion: Stimulated strongly correlated both The rates improved from Salivary function, each gland, appeared be lost exponentially rate approximately 5%/1 Gy dose. Additional research is necessary distinguish among for use planning. incidence xerostomia significantly decreased least one kept

参考文章(69)
S. Handler, L.R. Brown, S. Dreizen, B.M. Levy, Radiation-induced xerostomia in cancer patients Cancer; (United States). ,(1976)
D Greenspan, XEROSTOMIA : DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT Oncology. ,vol. 10, pp. 7- 11 ,(1996)
Samuel Dreizen, Thomas E. Daly, Joe B. Drane, Lee R. Brown, Oral complications of cancer radiotherapy Postgraduate Medicine. ,vol. 61, pp. 85- 92 ,(1977) , 10.1080/00325481.1977.11712115
F G LeVeque, M Montgomery, D Potter, M B Zimmer, J W Rieke, B W Steiger, S C Gallagher, C C Muscoplat, A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration study of oral pilocarpine for treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 11, pp. 1124- 1131 ,(1993) , 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.6.1124
Chad M Amosson, Bin S Teh, T.John Van, Nathan Uy, Eugene Huang, Wei-Yuan Mai, Anna Frolov, Shiao Y Woo, J.Kam Chiu, L.Steven Carpenter, Hsin H Lu, Walter H Grant, E.Brian Butler, Dosimetric predictors of xerostomia for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with the smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost technique. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 56, pp. 136- 144 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00093-2
John F. Fowler, The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy British Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 62, pp. 679- 694 ,(1989) , 10.1259/0007-1285-62-740-679
Stanley Lemeshow, David W. Hosmer, Applied Logistic Regression ,(1989)