The infeasibility of experimental quantification of life-critical software reliability

作者: Ricky W. Butler , George B. Finelli

DOI: 10.1145/123041.123054

关键词:

摘要: This paper affirms that quantification of life-critical software reliability is infeasible using statistical methods whether applied to standard or fault-tolerant software. The key assumption fault tolerance|separately programmed versions fail independently|is shown be problematic. cannot justified by experimentation in the ultra-reliability region and subjective arguments its favor are not sufficiently strong justify it as an axiom. Also, implications recent multi-version experiments support this affirmation.

参考文章(15)
John C. Knight, Nancy G. Leveson, An experimental evaluation of the assumption of independence in multiversion programming IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. ,vol. 12, pp. 96- 109 ,(1986) , 10.1109/TSE.1986.6312924
Predicting Software Reliability Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. ,vol. 327, pp. 513- 527 ,(1989) , 10.1098/RSTA.1989.0007
Ivars Peterson, A Digital Matter of Life and Death Science News. ,vol. 133, pp. 170- ,(1988) , 10.2307/3972488
John C. Knight, Nancy G. Leveson, A reply to the criticisms of the Knight & Leveson experiment ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. ,vol. 15, pp. 24- 35 ,(1990) , 10.1145/382294.382710
Peter A. Keiller, Douglas R. Miller, On the use and the performance of software reliability growth models Reliability Engineering & System Safety. ,vol. 32, pp. 95- 117 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0951-8320(91)90049-D
Bev Littlewood, Stochastic Reliability-Growth: A Model for Fault-Removal in Computer-Programs and Hardware-Designs IEEE Transactions on Reliability. ,vol. R-30, pp. 313- 320 ,(1981) , 10.1109/TR.1981.5221099
Abdalla A. Abdel-Ghaly, P. Y. Chan, Bev Littlewood, Evaluation of competing software reliability predictions IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. ,vol. 12, pp. 950- 967 ,(1986) , 10.1109/TSE.1986.6313050
Nancy G. Leveson, Software safety: why, what, and how ACM Computing Surveys. ,vol. 18, pp. 125- 163 ,(1986) , 10.1145/7474.7528