Epistemic Consequences of Bibliometrics-based Evaluation: Insights from the Scientific Community

作者: Tommaso Castellani , Emanuele Pontecorvo , Adriana Valente

DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2015.1065929

关键词:

摘要: The aim of this paper is to investigate the consequences bibliometrics-based evaluation system scientific production on contents and methods sciences. research has been conducted by means in-depth interviews a multi-disciplinary panel Italian researchers. We discuss implications choice topic, experimental practices, dissemination habits. observe that validation practices relies acceptance diffusion within community, these are self-sustained through their wide application. possible evolving scenarios, also considering recent development digital archives.

参考文章(85)
Karin Knorr Cetina, Laboratory Studies: The Cultural Approach to the Study of Science Science and technology studies. ,(1995)
Fulvio Naldi, Daniela Luzi, Adriana Valente, Ilaria Vannini Parenti, Scientific and Technological Performance by Gender Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 299- 314 ,(2004) , 10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_14
Michael Polanyi, Marjorie Glicksman Grene, Knowing and being : essays University of Chicago Press. ,(1969)
Derek J. de Solla Price, Little Science, Big Science...and Beyond ,(1986)
Paula Stephan, None, How Economics Shapes Science ,(2012)
Massimiano Bucchi, Brian Trench, Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology Routledge. ,(2008) , 10.4324/9780203928240
Lewis I. Gidez, The Peer Reviews Process Serials Librarian. ,vol. 19, pp. 75- 85 ,(1991) , 10.1300/J123V19N03_09