Consumer Acceptance of Personalized Nutrition

作者: Zoltán Szakály , András Fehér , Marietta Kiss

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816403-7.00009-X

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The efforts made to decrease the occurrence of nutrition-related diseases over last few decades have not been effective. A move from population-based nutrition guidance toward personalized (including nutrigenomics) may offer a new way changing habits, but it still awaits widespread consumer acceptance, despite mainly positive attitudes concept itself. Consumer acceptance will eventually depend on interplay its perceived benefits and risks. main drivers are an increasing knowledge relationship between genes nutrition; being personally affected by diseases; greater efficiency, enjoyment, comprehensibility advice when compared with generalized recommendations; current marketing trend individualization. However, is hindered by, among other things, consumers’ privacy concerns, their fears related results nutrigenomics tests, high costs these tests.

参考文章(113)
Kelly M Adams, Karen C Lindell, Martin Kohlmeier, Steven H Zeisel, Status of nutrition education in medical schools The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ,vol. 83, ,(2006) , 10.1093/AJCN/83.4.941S
Jennie Ahlgren, Anders Nordgren, Maud Perrudin, Amber Ronteltap, Jean Savigny, Hans van Trijp, Karin Nordström, Ulf Görman, Consumers on the Internet: ethical and legal aspects of commercialization of personalized nutrition Genes and Nutrition. ,vol. 8, pp. 349- 355 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S12263-013-0331-0
Ibidapo Akinleye, J. Scott Roberts, Charmaine D. M. Royal, Erin Linnenbringer, Thomas O. Obisesan, Grace-Ann Fasaye, Robert C. Green, Differences Between African American and White Research Volunteers in Their Attitudes, Beliefs and Knowledge Regarding Genetic Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease Journal of Genetic Counseling. ,vol. 20, pp. 650- 659 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S10897-011-9377-6
Sharon Hensley Alford, Colleen M. McBride, Robert J. Reid, Eric B. Larson, Andreas D. Baxevanis, Lawrence C. Brody, Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group. Public Health Genomics. ,vol. 14, pp. 85- 93 ,(2011) , 10.1159/000294277
A.R Aro, A Hakonen, M Hietala, J Lönnqvist, P Niemelä, L Peltonen, P Aula, Acceptance of genetic testing in a general population: age, education and gender differences Patient Education and Counseling. ,vol. 32, pp. 41- 49 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00061-X
Frieda Basson, Merle Joyce Futter, Jacquie Greenberg, Qualitative research methodology in the exploration of patients' perceptions of participating in a genetic research program. Ophthalmic Genetics. ,vol. 28, pp. 143- 149 ,(2007) , 10.1080/13816810701356627
Emma L. Beckett, Patrice R. Jones, Martin Veysey, Mark Lucock, Nutrigenetics—Personalized Nutrition in the Genetic Age Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine. ,vol. 2, pp. 1- 8 ,(2017) , 10.14218/ERHM.2017.00027
Aleksandra Berezowska, Arnout R.H. Fischer, Amber Ronteltap, Sharron Kuznesof, Anna Macready, Rosalind Fallaize, Hans C.M. van Trijp, Understanding consumer evaluations of personalised nutrition services in terms of the privacy calculus: a qualitative study Public Health Genomics. ,vol. 17, pp. 127- 140 ,(2014) , 10.1159/000358851
Aleksandra Berezowska, Arnout R. H. Fischer, Amber Ronteltap, Ivo A. van der Lans, Hans C. M. van Trijp, Consumer adoption of personalised nutrition services from the perspective of a risk–benefit trade-off Genes and Nutrition. ,vol. 10, pp. 42- 42 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S12263-015-0478-Y
Manuela M. Bergmann, Ulf Görman, John C Mathers, Bioethical Considerations for Human Nutrigenomics Annual Review of Nutrition. ,vol. 28, pp. 447- 467 ,(2008) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.NUTR.28.061807.155344