Flight Control Reconfiguration Based on Online Physical Model Identification and Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion

作者: Thomas Lombaerts , Ping Chu , Jan Albert (Bob) Mulder

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11690-2_13

关键词:

摘要: There are many control approaches possible in order to achieve fault tolerant flight control. An important aspect of these algorithms is that they should not only be robust, but even adaptive some way, adapt the faulty situation, see Ref. [1] and [5] literature. In category algorithms, a distinction made between indirect direct Indirect involves two stages. First, an estimate plant model generated online. Once available, it used generate controller parameters. Instead estimating model, algorithm estimates parameters directly controller. This can done via main approaches: output error input error. Of both categories mentioned here, preferable due its flexibility property being based. categories, there also subversions, namely reference (MRAC) self-tuning (STC). former, one relies on works minimizing tracking (such as concept sliding mode control). With feasible three goals, trim value adjustment for inputs, decoupling inputs outputs closed loop pilot commands, [1]. Self-tuning focuses adapting (PID) gains by making use estimated parameter values known more flexible, [21]. Currently, much research performed field control, where adaptation extensive than tuning PID gains. One new possibilities predictive (AMPC), which interesting thanks nature deal with (input) inequality constraints. These constraints good representation actuator faults. It noted have been already successful applications MPC [10] [14]. alternative nonlinear approach discussed this chapter, allows develop reconfigurable routine placing emphasis physical models, thus producing internal physically interpretable at any time.

参考文章(38)
Jan M. Maciejowski, Colin N. Jones, MPC fault-tolerant flight control case study: flight 1862 IFAC Proceedings Volumes. ,vol. 36, pp. 119- 124 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)36480-7
Karen Gundy-Burlet, K. KrishnaKumar, John Kaneshige, Daniel Clancy, Don Soloway, Intelligent Control Approaches for Aircraft Applications ,(2001)
Gary J. Balas, Subhabrata Ganguli, J ´ ozsef Bokor, APPLICATION OF FDI TO A NONLINEAR BOEING-747 AIRCRAFT ,(2002)
Chingiz Hajiyev, Fikret Caliskan, Fault diagnosis and reconfiguration in flight control systems ,(2003)
Jean-Jacques E. Slotine, Weiping Li, Applied Nonlinear Control ,(1991)
M. Laban, On-Line Aircraft Aerodynamic Model Identification TU Delft, Delft University of Technology. ,(1994)
D.A. Joosten, T.J.J. van den Boom, T.J.J. Lombaerts, Effective control allocation in fault-tolerant flight control using feedback linearisation and model predictive control european control conference. pp. 3552- 3559 ,(2007) , 10.23919/ECC.2007.7068917
Manu Sharma, Anthony J Calise, Seungjae Lee, Development of a Reconfigurable Flight Control Law for the X-36 Tailless Fighter Aircraft AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. ,(2000) , 10.2514/6.2000-3940
Viswanath Ramakrishna, L.R. Hunt, G. Meyer, Brief Parameter variations, relative degree, and stable inversion Automatica. ,vol. 37, pp. 871- 880 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00029-2