Society of Gynecologic Investigation: what gets published?

作者: Sonal G. Gandhi , William M. Gilbert

DOI: 10.1016/J.JSGI.2004.06.005

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVE To compare publication rates of the plenary slide presentations (plenary), concurrent (concurrent), and poster (poster) at Society for Gynecologic Investigation (SGI) meetings interval 1990 to 1999. METHODS The SGI program abstract books years 1990-1999 were examined, with all twice number randomly selected abstracts identified. For each abstract, PUBMED was used search authors subject topics, if needed. Rates in various journals compared: group 1: weekly general (New England Journal Medicine [NEJM], American Medical Association [JAMA], Nature); 2: monthly obstetrics/gynecology (American Obstetrics Gynecology, Gynecology); 3: other (Placenta, Maternal Fetal Medicine, Fertility Sterility, etc). Factors predicting ultimate assessed by multivariable analysis. RESULTS Over 10-year period, 75% plenary, concurrent, 66% published (P = not significant [NS]), majority being 3 journals. Multivariable analysis did find any factor predictive or groups. Sixty-five percent basic science-related this change over time. CONCLUSIONS have an overall rate 68%, which is higher than that reported literature societies (29-45%). Furthermore, different from rate. This suggests types are quality as measured continues publish predominantly science research, one its missions.

参考文章(11)
Yoon K Loke, Sheena Derry, Does anybody read "evidence-based" articles? BMC Medical Research Methodology. ,vol. 3, pp. 14- 14 ,(2003) , 10.1186/1471-2288-3-14
William F. Marx, Huy M. Do, David F. Kallmes, Harry J. Cloft, The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 20, pp. 1173- 1177 ,(1999)
Erik von Elm, Michael C Costanza, Bernhard Walder, Martin R Tramèr, More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology. ,vol. 3, pp. 12- 12 ,(2003) , 10.1186/1471-2288-3-12
J. Castillo, R. Garcia-Guasch, I. Cifuentes, Fate of abstracts from the Paris 1995 European Society of Anaesthesiologists meeting European Journal of Anaesthesiology. ,vol. 19, pp. 888- 893 ,(2002) , 10.1017/S0265021502001424
John J. Jasko, James H. Wood, Herbert S. Schwartz, Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual musculoskeletal tumor society meetings. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 415, pp. 98- 103 ,(2003) , 10.1097/01.BLO.0000093902.12372.76
A. E. Carroll, C. M. Sox, B. A. Tarini, S. Ringold, D. A. Christakis, Does presentation format at the Pediatric Academic Societies' annual meeting predict subsequent publication? Pediatrics. ,vol. 112, pp. 1238- 1241 ,(2003) , 10.1542/PEDS.112.6.1238
Charles G. Roland, Richard A. Kirkpatrick, Time Lapse between Hypothesis and Publication in the Medical Sciences New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 292, pp. 1273- 1276 ,(1975) , 10.1056/NEJM197506122922405
Joost P. H. Drenth, Multiple authorship: the contribution of senior authors. JAMA. ,vol. 280, pp. 219- 221 ,(1998) , 10.1001/JAMA.280.3.219
William M Gilbert, Roy M Pitkin, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting presentations: what gets published and why? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 191, pp. 32- 35 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2004.03.078