Are Risk-Benefit Tradeoffs Possible in Siting Hazardous Facilities?

作者: Howard Kunreuther , Douglas Easterling

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Ever since Alfred Marshall introduced the notion of consumer's surplus into literature as a measure well-being, economists have been interested in determining amount compensation required to leave individuals indifferent between status quo and new situation where less commodity can be consumed (for example, due an increase prices). The Hicksian Kaldor-Hicks criteria specifying variations may appropriate for normal market goods there is wellspecified demand curve. analysis applicable dealing with environmental resources elements risk are involved, or exist public good features that make it difficult estimate people's values different amenities (V. Kerry Smith, 1989). This paper investigates question role providing benefits host community (possibly form compensation) play improving chances siting facility perceived potentially hazardous. In Section I, we develop simple twoperiod expected utility model explain preferences benefit packages. empirical examining predictive power this will related following problem current interest: U.S. Congress attempting locate site storing high-level radioactive waste from commercial nuclear plants United States. An underground repository constructed 2000 feet below earth's surface purpose permanently shipped casks around country. Once filled capacity, would sealed minimize any radiation leakage. Based on results telephone survey residents Nevada regarding their attitudes toward repository, suggest ways might modified take account behavioral factors not normally considered part individual models choice under uncertainty. These useful when tool facilitating process.

参考文章(13)
W. Tobiasson, Y. Zhang, Sustainable electricity grid development and the public: an economic approach. Sustainable Energy Policy and Strategies for Europe,14th IAEE European Conference,October 28-31, 2014. ,(2014) , 10.17863/CAM.5845
Carol Mansfield, George L. Van Houtven, Joel Huber, Compensating for Public Harms: Why Public Goods Are Preferred to Money Land Economics. ,vol. 78, pp. 368- 389 ,(2002) , 10.2307/3146896
Marie Lynn Miranda, James N Miller, Timothy L Jacobs, Talking trash about landfills: Using quantitative scoring schemes in landfill siting processes Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. ,vol. 19, pp. 3- 22 ,(2000) , 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(200024)19:1<3::AID-PAM2>3.0.CO;2-1
Juan Camilo Cardenas, John Stranlund, Cleve Willis, Local Environmental Control and Institutional Crowding-Out World Development. ,vol. 28, pp. 1719- 1733 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00055-3
Howard Kunreuther, William H. Desvousges, Paul Slovto, Nevada's Predicament Public Perceptions of Risk from the Proposed Nuclear Waste Repository Environment. ,vol. 30, pp. 16- 33 ,(1988) , 10.1080/00139157.1988.9932541
Laura I. Langbein, Responsive bureaus, equity, and regulatory negotiation: an empirical view Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. ,vol. 21, pp. 449- 465 ,(2002) , 10.1002/PAM.10054
P Slovic, Perception of risk. Science. ,vol. 236, pp. 280- 285 ,(1987) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.3563507
Howard Kunreuther, Doug Easterling, The Role of Compensation in Siting Hazardous Facilities Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. ,vol. 15, pp. 601- 622 ,(1996) , 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199623)15:4<601::AID-PAM6>3.0.CO;2-L