Quantitation in gas chromatography: usual practices and performances of a response factor database

作者: Esmeralda Cicchetti , Philippe Merle , Alain Chaintreau

DOI: 10.1002/FFJ.1906

关键词:

摘要: In this study, usual methods commonly applied to report the quantitative composition of flavours, fragrances and essential oils were compared. The MS determinations without response factors exhibited a lack accuracy reproducibility. FID provided better results, but still unsatisfactory. best results obtained by true internal standardization in FID, which is time-consuming for mixtures composed many constituents. use factor database was thus proposed validated testing dependence on GC parameters, using an experimental design. Very low time variations observed. Under standard conditions, determination model mixture with four different instruments mean bias < 3.4%.

参考文章(19)
C.G. Blanco, J.S. Canga, A. Domínguez, M.J. Iglesias, M.D. Guillén, Flame ionization detection relative response factors of some polycyclic aromatic compounds: Determination of the main components of the coal tar pitch volatile fraction Journal of Chromatography A. ,vol. 607, pp. 295- 302 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0021-9673(92)87088-P
M. Kállai, V. Máté, J. Balla, Effects of experimental conditions on the determination of the effective carbon number Chromatographia. ,vol. 57, pp. 639- 644 ,(2003) , 10.1007/BF02491742
Hartmut. Bruderreck, Werner. Schneider, Istvan. Halasz, Quantitative Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Hydrocarbons with Capillary Columns and Flame Ionization Detector. Analytical Chemistry. ,vol. 33, pp. 461- 473 ,(1961) , 10.1021/AC60209A044
Farid Benkaci–Ali, Aoumeur Baaliouamer, Brahim Y. Meklati, Farid Chemat, Chemical composition of seed essential oils from Algerian Nigella sativa extracted by microwave and hydrodistillation Flavour and Fragrance Journal. ,vol. 22, pp. 148- 153 ,(2007) , 10.1002/FFJ.1773
Alan R. Katritzky, Elena S. Ignatchenko, Richard A. Barcock, Victor S. Lobanov, Mati. Karelson, Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Times and Response Factors Using a General Qualitative Structure-Property Relationships Treatment Analytical Chemistry. ,vol. 66, pp. 1799- 1807 ,(1994) , 10.1021/AC00083A005
Andrew D. Jorgensen, Kurt C. Picel, Vassilis C. Stamoudis, Prediction of gas chromatography flame ionization detector response factors from molecular structures Analytical Chemistry. ,vol. 62, pp. 683- 689 ,(1990) , 10.1021/AC00206A007
A. El-Naggar, Factors Affecting Linearity and Response of Flame Ionization Detector Petroleum Science and Technology. ,vol. 24, pp. 41- 50 ,(2006) , 10.1081/LFT-200044407
A.J.C. Nicholson, D.L. Swingler, Ion Formation in the Flame Ionization Detector Combustion and Flame. ,vol. 39, pp. 43- 52 ,(1980) , 10.1016/0010-2180(80)90005-X
M. Dressler, M. Cigánek, Effect of detector temperature on the flame ionization detector response Journal of Chromatography A. ,vol. 679, pp. 299- 305 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0021-9673(94)80572-5
Giuseppe Musumarra, Danila Pisano, Alan R. Katritzky, Andrzej R. Lapucha, Franz J. Luxem, Ramiah Murugan, Michael Siskin, Glen Brons, Prediction of gas chromatographic response factors by the PLS method Tetrahedron Computer Methodology. ,vol. 2, pp. 17- 36 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0898-5529(89)90026-2