Systematic review and meta-analysis: what are the implications in the clinical practice?

作者: Claudia Trindade Mattos , Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas

DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.017-019.EBO

关键词:

摘要: That means that, according to evidence-based Dentistry, clini-cally significant results found in clinical and labora-torial researches will be incorporated prac -tice, especially dependence on conclusions drawn from systematic reviews meta-analyses. For this reason, assessing articles understanding their findings may a valuable time saver for every clini -cian who wishes introduce new conducts, tech-nologies or treatments into his/her practice responsible scientific manner. Therefore, reading good review meta-analysis would prevent clinicians several origi-nal research (which gathered the review) with view reaching conclusion. However, it is critical clinician read meta-analyses minimum comprehension of structure characteristics order interpret reliable clinically advantageous manner.Systematic are defined as investi -gations that attempt answer focused questions present pre-planned strategies include all relevant articles, appraise primary trials synthesize data, making an effort reduce bias,

参考文章(6)
Larry V. Hedges, Michael Borenstein, Julian P. T. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein, Introduction to Meta-Analysis ,(2009)
David A. Feldstein, Clinician's guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin. ,vol. 104, pp. 25- ,(2005)
Julian P. T. Higgins, Sally Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ,(2019)
Fernanda Angelieri, Evidence-based Orthodontics: has it something to do with your patient? Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 18, pp. 11- 13 ,(2013) , 10.1590/S2176-94512013000500003
LC Maia, AG Antonio, Systematic Reviews in Dental Research. A Guideline. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. ,vol. 37, pp. 117- 124 ,(2012) , 10.17796/JCPD.37.2.H606137VJ3826V61