作者: Claudia Trindade Mattos , Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas
DOI: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.017-019.EBO
关键词:
摘要: That means that, according to evidence-based Dentistry, clini-cally significant results found in clinical and labora-torial researches will be incorporated prac -tice, especially dependence on conclusions drawn from systematic reviews meta-analyses. For this reason, assessing articles understanding their findings may a valuable time saver for every clini -cian who wishes introduce new conducts, tech-nologies or treatments into his/her practice responsible scientific manner. Therefore, reading good review meta-analysis would prevent clinicians several origi-nal research (which gathered the review) with view reaching conclusion. However, it is critical clinician read meta-analyses minimum comprehension of structure characteristics order interpret reliable clinically advantageous manner.Systematic are defined as investi -gations that attempt answer focused questions present pre-planned strategies include all relevant articles, appraise primary trials synthesize data, making an effort reduce bias,