Activity intensity, assistive devices and joint replacement influence predicted remodelling in the proximal femur.

作者: A. S. Dickinson

DOI: 10.1007/S10237-015-0678-9

关键词:

摘要: Bone morphology and density changes are commonly observed following joint replacement, may contribute to the risks of implant loosening periprosthetic fracture reduce available bone stock for revision surgery. This study was presented in ‘Bone Cartilage Mechanobiology across scales’ WCCM symposium review development remodelling prediction methods demonstrate simulation adaptive around hip replacement femoral components, incorporating intrinsic (prosthesis) extrinsic (activity loading) factors. An iterative process applied finite element models a femur implanted with cementless total (THR) resurfacing implant. Previously developed cemented THR implant, this modified enabled influence pre- post-operative patient activity loading be evaluated. A control algorithm used identical conditions, predicted extents temporal trends were measured by generating virtual X-rays DXA scans. The improved qualitative quantitative predictions both implants, but demonstrated sensitivity scan region definition appropriate implant–bone position sizing. Predicted intact response changed that simplified model, although effects important, mechanics implantation dominant. supports application predictive as one range physical computational studies, which should conducted preclinical evaluation new prostheses.

参考文章(81)
Margaret Kuhn, Marcie Harris-Hayes, Karen Steger-May, Gail Pashos, John C. Clohisy, Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years or less: do we improve activity profiles? Journal of Arthroplasty. ,vol. 28, pp. 872- 876 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ARTH.2012.10.009
R B Martin, Porosity and specific surface of bone. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. ,vol. 10, pp. 179- 222 ,(1984)
Justin Fernandez, Massimo Sartori, David Lloyd, Jacob Munro, Vickie Shim, Bone remodelling in the natural acetabulum is influenced by muscle force-induced bone stress. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering. ,vol. 30, pp. 28- 41 ,(2014) , 10.1002/CNM.2586
B Cohen, N Rushton, Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume. ,vol. 77, pp. 815- 819 ,(1995) , 10.1302/0301-620X.77B5.7559717
Prakash Chandran, Mohammed Azzabi, Mark Andrews, John G. Bradley, Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling after 12 Years Differs in Cemented and Uncemented Hip Arthroplasties Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. ,vol. 470, pp. 1431- 1435 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S11999-011-2134-1
Mamadou T. Bah, Prasanth B. Nair, Mark Taylor, Martin Browne, Efficient computational method for assessing the effects of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements. Journal of Biomechanics. ,vol. 44, pp. 1417- 1422 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2010.12.027
Sanjay Gupta, Andrew M.R. New, Mark Taylor, Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head Clinical Biomechanics. ,vol. 21, pp. 594- 602 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2006.01.010
Yong-yun Lian, Fu-xing Pei, Myung-chul Yoo, Jing-qiu Cheng, Camara-yagouba Fatou, Changes of the bone mineral density in proximal femur following total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in osteonecrosis of femoral head. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. ,vol. 26, pp. 453- 459 ,(2008) , 10.1002/JOR.20503