What’s Wrong with Genetic Engineering? Ethics, Socioscientific Issues, and Education

作者: Bradley D. Rowe

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3929-3_9

关键词:

摘要: In “Moral-Ethical Character and Science Education,” Michael Mueller Dana Zeidler ground their ecojustice ethic mostly within a consequentialist theoretical framework. Consequentialism is the philosophical theory that determines morality of an action by looking at various consequences or effects produces (Troyer 2003). One does not judge as morally defensible indefensible critiquing in itself, but rather good bad follow. For authors, it immediate act biogenetically transforming species Danio rerio into ornamental, fluorescent-glowing pet fish, “GloFish,” suspect. It is, instead, social environmental risks might, fact have, ensued from this act. response I will primarily focus on ethics what clearly forceful socioscientific issue – genetically modified organisms (GMOs) extend ethical-educational conversation started Zeidler.

参考文章(11)
Paola Cavalieri, Peter Singer, The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity ,(1994)
Richard George Botzler, Susan J. Armstrong, The Animal Ethics Reader ,(2008)
Jean jacques Rousseau, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emile or on Education ,(2021)
Bernard E. Rollin, The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals Cambridge studies in philosophy and public policy;. ,(1995) , 10.1017/CBO9781139172806
Tom Regan, The Case for Animal Rights ,(1983)
Immanuel Kant, James W. Ellington, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals ,(2020)