18F-fluciclovine PET-CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: a prospective, single-centre, single-arm, comparative imaging trial.

作者: Jeremie Calais , Francesco Ceci , Matthias Eiber , Thomas A Hope , Michael S Hofman

DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30415-2

关键词:

摘要: Summary Background National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines consider 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence localisation after radical prostatectomy, whereas European Association of Urology recommend prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-CT. To the best our knowledge, no prospective head-to-head comparison between these tests has been done so far. The aim this study was to compare prospectively paired and PSMA scans localising prostatectomy in patients with low (PSA) concentrations ( Methods This a prospective, single-centre, open-label, single-arm comparative at University California Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA). Patients older than 18 years age PSA levels ranging from 0·2 2·0 ng/mL without any prior salvage therapy Karnofsky performance status least 50 were eligible. underwent (reference test) (index within 15 days. Detection rate patient level by anatomical region primary endpoint. A statistical power analysis demonstrated that sample size needed show 22% difference detection rates favour (test superiority). Each PET scan interpreted three independent masked readers consensus majority interpretation generated (two vs one) determine positive findings. is registered ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02940262, complete. Findings Between Feb 26, 2018, Sept 20, 143 screened eligibility, whom enrolled into study. Median follow-up 8 months (IQR 7–9). endpoint met; significantly lower (13 [26%; 95% CI 15–40] 50) (28 [56%; 41–70] 50), an odds ratio (OR) 4·8 (95% 1·6–19·2; p=0·0026) level; subanalysis pelvic nodes (four [8%; 2–19] [30%; 18–45] PET-CT; OR 12·0 [1·8–513·0], p=0·0034); extrapelvic lesions (none [0%; 0–6] eight [16%; 7–29]; non-estimable [95% non-estimable], p=0·0078). Interpretation With higher rates, should be tracer choice when imaging considered subsequent treatment management decisions (≤2·0 ng/mL). Further research investigate whether translate improved oncological outcomes. Funding None.

参考文章(28)
Osman Ratib, Andrew Quon, Johannes Czernin, Benjamin S Halpern, Magnus Dahlbom, Daniel H Silverman, Christian Schiepers, Christian Waldherr, Impact of patient weight and emission scan duration on PET/CT image quality and lesion detectability. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 45, pp. 797- 801 ,(2004)
J. J. Morigi, P. D. Stricker, P. J. van Leeuwen, R. Tang, B. Ho, Q. Nguyen, G. Hruby, G. Fogarty, R. Jagavkar, A. Kneebone, A. Hickey, S. Fanti, L. Tarlinton, L. Emmett, Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 56, pp. 1185- 1190 ,(2015) , 10.2967/JNUMED.115.160382
Sebastian Mannweiler, Peter Amersdorfer, Slave Trajanoski, Jonathan A. Terrett, David King, Gabor Mehes, Heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate carcinoma with distant metastasis. Pathology & Oncology Research. ,vol. 15, pp. 167- 172 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S12253-008-9104-2
Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Eleni Avtzi, Frederik L. Giesel, Tim Holland-Letz, Heinz G. Linhart, Matthias Eder, Michael Eisenhut, Silvan Boxler, Boris A. Hadaschik, Clemens Kratochwil, Wilko Weichert, Klaus Kopka, Jürgen Debus, Uwe Haberkorn, The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. ,vol. 42, pp. 197- 209 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S00259-014-2949-6
Brian J. McParland, Anders Wall, Silvia Johansson, Jens Sørensen, The clinical safety, biodistribution and internal radiation dosimetry of [18F]fluciclovine in healthy adult volunteers European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. ,vol. 40, pp. 1256- 1264 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00259-013-2403-1
Carlos Cordon-Cardo, Warren D. W. Heston, Inmaculada Pellicer, William R. Fair, David A. Silver, Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clinical Cancer Research. ,vol. 3, pp. 81- 85 ,(1997)
Qian Wang, Charles G. Bailey, Cynthia Ng, Jessamy Tiffen, Annora Thoeng, Vineet Minhas, Melanie L. Lehman, Stephen C. Hendy, Grant Buchanan, Colleen C. Nelson, John E.J. Rasko, Jeff Holst, Androgen Receptor and Nutrient Signaling Pathways Coordinate the Demand for Increased Amino Acid Transport during Prostate Cancer Progression Cancer Research. ,vol. 71, pp. 7525- 7536 ,(2011) , 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1821
Matthias Eder, Martin Schäfer, Ulrike Bauder-Wüst, William-Edmund Hull, Carmen Wängler, Walter Mier, Uwe Haberkorn, Michael Eisenhut, 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging Bioconjugate Chemistry. ,vol. 23, pp. 688- 697 ,(2012) , 10.1021/BC200279B
M. Eiber, T. Maurer, M. Souvatzoglou, A. J. Beer, A. Ruffani, B. Haller, F.-P. Graner, H. Kubler, U. Haberhorn, M. Eisenhut, H.-J. Wester, J. E. Gschwend, M. Schwaiger, Evaluation of Hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 56, pp. 668- 674 ,(2015) , 10.2967/JNUMED.115.154153
Cristina Nanni, Lucia Zanoni, Cristian Pultrone, Riccardo Schiavina, Eugenio Brunocilla, Filippo Lodi, Claudio Malizia, Matteo Ferrari, Patrizio Rigatti, Cristina Fonti, Giuseppe Martorana, Stefano Fanti, 18 F-FACBC (anti1-amino-3- 18 F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid) versus 11 C-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer relapse: results of a prospective trial European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. ,vol. 43, pp. 1601- 1610 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S00259-016-3329-1