Preliminary effects of fire and mechanical fuel treatments on the abundance of small mammals in the mixed-conifer forest of the Sierra Nevada

作者: Andrew J. Amacher , Reginald H. Barrett , Jason J. Moghaddas , Scott L. Stephens

DOI: 10.1016/J.FORECO.2007.10.059

关键词:

摘要: Many western conifer forests were historically affected by frequent, low- to mixed-severity fires. A legacy of fire suppression, logging, grazing and other factors has created current forest habitats that do not reflect historical conditions. The increasing size, severity, costs catastrophic wildfires are now focusing wildland management research towards proactive fuel treatments designed reduce hazards across landscapes. As part the National Fire Surrogate (FFS) study, we researched effects three on small mammal populations within Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Twelve stands selected randomly from a set available stands. Each stand was assigned one four treatment groups: controls, prescribed only, mechanical plus combined. Abundance California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi), long-eared chipmunks (Tamias quadrimaculatus), brush mice (Peromyscus boylii), deer maniculatus) monitored both pre- post-treatment. Only mouse had significant effect. Deer abundance significantly increased post-treatment only treatments, declined treatments. All species effect year, with higher overall in period. In addition experimental analysis, models containing stand-level covariates vegetation characteristics examined compared using model selection procedures. improved upon analysis for mouse. Brush found have positive association canopy cover. Our results suggest burning negative For species, dominant year suggests other, more regional may abundance. Possible explanations included an increase precipitation post-treatment, major cone crop 2002, decline gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) occurrence. mouse, evaluation trap locations indicates this associated dense clumps tan oak (Lithocarpus densiflorus) or riparian areas. Leaving areas low cover benefit where reduction implemented. study documented immediate impacts is needed determine if our will persist through time.

参考文章(79)
Robert E. Martin, John D. Dell, Planning for Prescribed Burning in the Inland Northwest ,(2017)
William C. McComb, Karl J. Martin, Small mammal habitat associations at patch and landscape scales in Oregon. Forest Science. ,vol. 48, pp. 255- 264 ,(2002) , 10.1093/FORESTSCIENCE/48.2.255
J. E. Keeley, J.J. Moghaddas, E.E. Knapp, J.D. Mciver, S.L. Stephens, The fire and fire surrogate study in the Sierra Nevada: Evaluating restoration treatments at Blodgett Experimental Forest and Sequoia National Park, General Technical Report. pp. 79- 86 ,(2004)
Wildland Resources, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project final report to Congress Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California. ,(1997)
Robert A. Muenchen, Joseph M. Hilbe, Help and Documentation Statistics and Computing. pp. 37- 44 ,(2010) , 10.1007/978-1-4419-1318-0_4
Harold H. Biswell, Prescribed Burning in California Wildlands Vegetation Management Prescribed burning in California wildlands vegetation management.. ,(1989) , 10.1525/9780520354067
Sarah McCaffrey, Theresa B. Jain, Russell T. Graham, Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity U.S. Deptment of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. ,(2004)
Brandon M. Collins, Scott L. Stephens, Fire regimes of mixed conifer forests in the north-central Sierra Nevada at multiple spatial scales Northwest Science. ,vol. 78, pp. 12- 23 ,(2004)