Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Monitoring, Datafication, and Consent: Legal Approaches to Privacy in the Big Data Context

作者: Katherine J. Strandburg , Julia Lane , Victoria Stodden , Stefan Bender , Helen Nissenbaum

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107590205.003

关键词:

摘要: Introduction Knowledge is power. ‘Big data’ has great potential to benefit society. At the same time, its availability creates significant for mistaken, misguided, or malevolent uses of personal information. The conundrum law provide space big data fulfill societal benefit, while protecting citizens adequately from related individual and social harms. Current privacy evolved address different concerns must be adapted confront data’s challenges. This chapter addresses only one aspect law: regulation private sector acquisition, aggregation, transfer It provides an overview taxonomy current law, highlighting mismatch between context, with goal informing debate about how bring practice into optimal harmony. Part I briefly describes in United States response a changing technological milieu. II introduces laws relating based on following features: (1) whether rule- fact-based standard; (2) substantive procedural, sense defined below; (3) which mode(s) acquisition are covered by law. also argues that recording, organization information form can used mining, here dubbed ‘datafication’, distinct implications often go unrecognized III selective relevant light taxonomy. Section A discusses most standards-like legal regimes, such as torts, determining liability generally involves fact-specific analysis behavior both subjects those who acquire (‘data handlers’). B Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC’s) ‘unfair deceptive trade practices’ standard, depends inquiry handlers, but makes general assumptions subjects.

参考文章(26)
Charles H. Kennedy, An ECPA for the 21st Century: The Present Reform Efforts and Beyond CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy. ,vol. 20, pp. 129- 162 ,(2011)
Jane Yakowitz, Tragedy of the Data Commons Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. ,vol. 25, pp. 1- ,(2011)
Dennis D. Hirsch, Is Privacy Regulation the Environmental Law of the Information Age? Privacy and Technologies of Identity. pp. 239- 253 ,(2006) , 10.1007/0-387-28222-X_14
Paul Ohm, The Underwhelming Benefits of Big Data University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online. ,vol. 161, pp. 22- ,(2013)
Daniel J. Solove, Introduction: Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma Harvard Law Review. ,vol. 126, pp. 1880- 1903 ,(2013)
Fred H. Cate, Protecting Privacy in Health Research: The Limits of Individual Choice California Law Review. ,vol. 98, pp. 1765- ,(2010) , 10.15779/Z38J988
Daniel J. Solove, Neil M. Richards, Prosser's Privacy Law: A Mixed Legacy Social Science Research Network. ,(2010)
Seth F. Kreimer, Watching the Watchers: Surveillance, Transparency, and Political Freedom in the War on Terror University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. ,vol. 7, pp. 133- ,(2004)
Fred H. Cate, Government Data Mining:The Need for a Legal Framework Social Science Research Network. ,(2008)
Jane R. Bambauer, The New Intrusion Social Science Research Network. ,(2012)