Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs.

作者: Malgorzata I Srebniak , Karin EM Diderich , Marieke Joosten , Lutgarde CP Govaerts , Jeroen Knijnenburg

DOI: 10.1038/EJHG.2015.193

关键词:

摘要: To evaluate the diagnostic value of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array testing in 1033 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies we investigated prevalence and genetic nature pathogenic findings. We reclassified all findings into three categories: causative findings; unexpected diagnoses (UD); susceptibility loci (SL) for neurodevelopmental disorders. After exclusion trisomy 13, 18, 21, sex-chromosomal aneuploidy triploidies, 76/1033 (7.4%) a chromosome abnormality was detected by genomic SNP array: 19/1033 cases (1.8%) microscopically detectable found 57/1033 (5.5%) submicroscopic detected. 58% (n=44) these abnormalities involved finding, 35% (n=27) SL disorder, 6% (n=5) UD an early-onset untreatable disease. In 0.3% parental samples incidental finding encountered. Our results confirm that should be preferred first-tier technique anomalies. All UDs diseases, which is beneficial patients to know. It also seems occur at comparable frequency among microscopic were more often than pregnancies without

参考文章(36)
Ronald J. Wapner, Deborah A. Driscoll, Joe Leigh Simpson, Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial. Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 32, pp. 396- 400 ,(2012) , 10.1002/PD.3863
Lisa G. Shaffer, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Mindy P. Dabell, Justine Coppinger, Anne M. Bandholz, Jay W. Ellison, J. Britt Ravnan, Beth S. Torchia, Blake C. Ballif, Allan J. Fisher, Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound. Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 32, pp. 986- 995 ,(2012) , 10.1002/PD.3943
SC Hillman, DJ McMullan, G Hall, FS Togneri, N James, EJ Maher, CH Meller, D Williams, RJ Wapner, ER Maher, MD Kilby, None, Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 41, pp. 610- 620 ,(2013) , 10.1002/UOG.12464
K Gunter, F Quan, J Zonana, K L Peterson, B W Popovich, R E Magenis, An atypical case of fragile X syndrome caused by a deletion that includes the FMR1 gene. American Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 56, pp. 1042- 1051 ,(1995)
M. I. Srebniak, D. Van Opstal, M. Joosten, K. E. M. Diderich, F. A. T. de Vries, S. Riedijk, M. F. C. M. Knapen, A. T. J. I. Go, L. C. P. Govaerts, R.-J. H. Galjaard, Whole-genome array as a first-line cytogenetic test in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 45, pp. 363- 372 ,(2015) , 10.1002/UOG.14745
C-N Lee, S-Y Lin, C-H Lin, J-C Shih, T-H Lin, Y-N Su, Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 119, pp. 614- 625 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2012.03279.X
M. C. de wit, M. I. Srebniak, L. C. P. Govaerts, D. Van Opstal, R. J. H. Galjaard, A. T. J. I. Go, Additional value of prenatal genomic array testing in fetuses with isolated structural ultrasound abnormalities and a normal karyotype: A systematic review of the literature Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 43, pp. 139- 146 ,(2014) , 10.1002/UOG.12575
Lisa G. Shaffer, Mindy P. Dabell, Allan J. Fisher, Justine Coppinger, Anne M. Bandholz, Jay W. Ellison, J. Britt Ravnan, Beth S. Torchia, Blake C. Ballif, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Experience with microarray‐based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 32, pp. 976- 985 ,(2012) , 10.1002/PD.3945
SC Hillman, Samantha Pretlove, Aravinthan Coomarasamy, DJ McMullan, EV Davison, ER Maher, MD Kilby, None, Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 37, pp. 6- 14 ,(2011) , 10.1002/UOG.7754