A New Paradigm for Social License as a Path to Marine Sustainability

作者: Lisa B. Uffman-Kirsch , Benjamin J. Richardson , Elizabeth Ingrid van Putten

DOI: 10.3389/FMARS.2020.571373

关键词:

摘要: Traditional marine governance can create inferior results. Management decisions customarily reflect fluctuating political priorities and formidable special-interest influence. Governments face distrust conflicts of interest. Industries or confusing rules. Communities feel disenfranchised to affect change. The environment exhibits the impacts. While perceived harm diverse values priorities, disputed facts legal questions conflict, informed empowered public engagement prepares governments forge socially legitimate environmentally acceptable decisions. Integrity, transparency inclusiveness matter. This article examines positive contributions engaged communities make relates it social license. Social license suffers critique as vague manufactured. Here its traditional understanding extra-legal approval that give resource choices is broadened include a legally sanctioned power deliberate—social engage. starting hypothesis rests in tradition designating oceans assets for which hold fiduciary duties sustainable management benefiting current future generations. trust doctrine houses this custom. A procedural due process right should stem from public-asset classification afford stakeholders standing ensure policy accords with doctrinal principles. (free), prior, consent participation standard provides best practice decision-making. Building on theories law, social, science, we suggest robust deliberation use actors methods earn sustain their operate, while governmental legitimacy bolstered by assuring opportunities are available protected outcomes utilized.

参考文章(17)
Joseph L. Sax, The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law : Effective Judicial Intervention Michigan Law Review. ,vol. 68, pp. 471- 566 ,(1970) , 10.2307/1287556
Kathe Callahan, Citizen Participation: Models and Methods International Journal of Public Administration. ,vol. 30, pp. 1179- 1196 ,(2007) , 10.1080/01900690701225366
Michael Keeley, Continuing the Social Contract Tradition Business Ethics Quarterly. ,vol. 5, pp. 241- 255 ,(1995) , 10.2307/3857355
Philippe Hanna, Frank Vanclay, Human rights, Indigenous peoples and the concept of Free, Prior and Informed Consent Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. ,vol. 31, pp. 146- 157 ,(2013) , 10.1080/14615517.2013.780373
Helen Ross, Marlene Buchy, Wendy Proctor, Laying Down the Ladder: A Typology of Public Participation in Australian Natural Resource Management Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 9, pp. 205- 217 ,(2002) , 10.1080/14486563.2002.10648561
Sherry R. Arnstein, A Ladder of Citizen Participation Journal of The American Planning Association. ,vol. 35, pp. 216- 224 ,(1969) , 10.1080/01944366908977225
Darragh Hare, Bernd Blossey, Principles of Public Trust Thinking Human Dimensions of Wildlife. ,vol. 19, pp. 397- 406 ,(2014) , 10.1080/10871209.2014.942759
Mark S. Reed, Anil Graves, Norman Dandy, Helena Posthumus, Klaus Hubacek, Joe Morris, Christina Prell, Claire H. Quinn, Lindsay C. Stringer, Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 90, pp. 1933- 1949 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2009.01.001
Nina Hall, Justine Lacey, Simone Carr-Cornish, Anne-Maree Dowd, Social licence to operate: understanding how a concept has been translated into practice in energy industries Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 86, pp. 301- 310 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.08.020