Frequency Importance Functions in Quiet and Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants

作者: Douglas P. Sladen , Todd. A. Ricketts

DOI: 10.1044/2015_AJA-15-0023

关键词:

摘要: Purpose Several studies have been devoted to understanding the frequency information available to adult users of cochlear implants when listening in quiet. The objective of this study was to construct frequency importance functions for a group of adults with cochlear implants and a group of adults with normal hearing both in quiet and in a +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Method Two groups of adults, 1 with cochlear implants and 1 with normal hearing, were asked to identify nonsense syllables in quiet and in the presence of 6-talker babble while “holes” were systematically created in the speech spectrum. Frequency importance functions were constructed. Results Results showed that adults with normal hearing placed greater weight on bands 1, 3, and 4 than on bands 2, 5, and 6, whereas adults with cochlear implants placed equal weight on all bands. The frequency importance functions for each group did not differ between listening in quiet and listening in noise. Conclusions Adults with cochlear implants assign perceptual weight toward different frequency bands, though the weight assignment does not differ between quiet and noisy conditions. Generalizing these results to the broader population of adults with implants is constrained by a small sample size.

参考文章(37)
Nan M. Laird, James H. Ware, Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, Applied Longitudinal Analysis ,(2004)
Ramon C. Littell, SAS System for Mixed Models ,(1996)
John B. Willett, Judith D. Singer, Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis ,(2003)
Philipos C. Loizou, Michael Dorman, Zhemin Tu, On the number of channels needed to understand speech Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 106, pp. 2097- 2103 ,(1999) , 10.1121/1.427954
R. V. Shannon, F.-G. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski, M. Ekelid, Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science. ,vol. 270, pp. 303- 304 ,(1995) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.270.5234.303
Todd A. Ricketts, D Wesley Grantham, Daniel H. Ashmead, David S. Haynes, Robert F. Labadie, Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ear and Hearing. ,vol. 27, pp. 763- 773 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.AUD.0000240814.27151.B9
N. R. French, J. C. Steinberg, Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 19, pp. 90- 119 ,(1945) , 10.1121/1.1916407
Maureen A. Mehr, Christopher W. Turner, Aaron Parkinson, Channel weights for speech recognition in cochlear implant users Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 109, pp. 359- 366 ,(2001) , 10.1121/1.1322021
Anthony J. Spahr, Michael F. Dorman, Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery. ,vol. 130, pp. 624- 628 ,(2004) , 10.1001/ARCHOTOL.130.5.624
Judy R. Dubno, Amy B. Schaefer, Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing‐impaired and masked normal‐hearing listeners The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 91, pp. 2110- 2121 ,(1992) , 10.1121/1.403697