An Economic Analysis of Cell-Free DNA Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the US General Pregnancy Population

作者: Peter Benn , Kirsten J. Curnow , Steven Chapman , Steven N. Michalopoulos , John Hornberger

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0132313

关键词:

摘要: Objective Analyze the economic value of replacing conventional fetal aneuploidy screening approaches with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in general pregnancy population. Methods Using decision-analysis modeling, we compared to NIPT cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis annual US population. Sensitivity and specificity for aneuploidies, trisomy 21, 18, 13, monosomy X, were estimated using published data modeling both first- second trimester screening. Costs assigned each test component an affected birth. The overall cost healthcare system considered costs, number aneuploid cases detected, invasive procedures performed, procedure-related euploid losses, pregnancies averted. analyses evaluated effect variation parameters. reported 2014 Dollars. Results Replacing would reduce costs if it can be provided $744 or less most influential variables timing entry, termination rates. Of 13,176 undergoing screening, detected 96.5% (12,717/13,176) cases, 85.9% (11,314/13,176) by approaches. reduced 60.0%, methods resulting 24,596 61,430 procedures, respectively. losses was 73.5% (194/264) population. Conclusion Based on our analysis, universal application increase detection rates economically justified. Offering this all pregnant women is associated substantial benefits.

参考文章(38)
N. J. Waitzman, R. M. Scheffler, Patrick S Romano, Estimates of the economic costs of birth defects. Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. ,vol. 31, pp. 188- 205 ,(1994)
Peter Benn, Antoni Borrell, Rossa W. K. Chiu, Howard Cuckle, Lorraine Dugoff, Brigitte Faas, Susan Gross, Tianhua Huang, Joann Johnson, Ron Maymon, Mary Norton, Anthony Odibo, Peter Schielen, Kevin Spencer, Dave Wright, Yuval Yaron, Position statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 35, pp. 725- 734 ,(2015) , 10.1002/PD.4608
Norman Beisdiei, James Brown, Patricia Parkinson, Janei Walstab, Urinary oestriol assay for monitoring fetoplacental function. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. ,vol. 31, pp. 1- 8 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1479-828X.1991.TB02753.X
Brandon S. Walker, Brian R. Jackson, Danielle LaGrave, Edward R. Ashwood, Robert L. Schmidt, A cost-effectiveness analysis of cell free DNA as a replacement for serum screening for Down syndrome Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 35, pp. 440- 446 ,(2015) , 10.1002/PD.4511
H. Zhang, Y. Gao, F. Jiang, M. Fu, Y. Yuan, Y. Guo, Z. Zhu, M. Lin, Q. Liu, Z. Tian, H. Zhang, F. Chen, T. K. Lau, L. Zhao, X. Yi, Y. Yin, W. Wang, Non‐invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146 958 pregnancies Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 45, pp. 530- 538 ,(2015) , 10.1002/UOG.14792
Howard Cuckle, Peter Benn, Eugene Pergament, Maternal cfDNA screening for Down syndrome – a cost sensitivity analysis Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 33, pp. 636- 642 ,(2013) , 10.1002/PD.4157
G. E. Palomaki, E. M. Kloza, G. M. Lambert-Messerlian, D. van den Boom, M. Ehrich, C. Deciu, A. T. Bombard, J. E. Haddow, Circulating cell free DNA testing: are some test failures informative? Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 35, pp. 289- 293 ,(2015) , 10.1002/PD.4541
Peter Benn, Antoni Borell, Rossa Chiu, Howard Cuckle, Lorraine Dugoff, Brigitte Faas, Susan Gross, Joann Johnson, Ron Maymon, Mary Norton, Anthony Odibo, Peter Schielen, Kevin Spencer, Tianhua Huang, Dave Wright, Yuval Yaron, Position statement from the Aneuploidy Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 33, pp. 622- 629 ,(2013) , 10.1002/PD.4139
Kypros H. Nicolaides, Argyro Syngelaki, M.M. Gil, Maria Soledad Quezada, Yana Zinevich, Prenatal Detection of Fetal Triploidy from Cell-Free DNA Testing in Maternal Blood Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. ,vol. 35, pp. 212- 217 ,(2014) , 10.1159/000355655