A comparison of multidisciplinary design, analysis and optimization processes in the building construction and aerospace industries
作者： John Haymaker , Forest Flager
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: Advancement in computer-based product modeling and analysis tools now allows diverse disciplines to simulate performance the early stages of Architecture, Engineering Construction (AEC) projects. How-ever, capability this technology permit AEC professionals quickly create, represent rigorously analyze design options from perspective multiple has not been fully realized compared other industries such as Aerospace. This paper compares Multidisciplinary Design, Analysis (MDA) Optimization (MDO) processes aerospace based upon case data gathered on recent projects each industry. Case study re-sults are then generalized by industry highlight respective strengths limitations current practice support effective MDA MDO. Finally, appropriateness adapting methods devel-oped is discussed.
scix.net参考文章(16)
Martin Fischer, Formalizing construction knowledge for concurrent performance-based design international conference on intelligent computing. pp. 186- 205 ,(2006) , 10.1007/11888598_20
John Haymaker, John Chachere, Coordinating goals, preferences, options, and analyses for the stanford living laboratory feasibility study international conference on intelligent computing. pp. 320- 327 ,(2006) , 10.1007/11888598_30
M Burry, Between intuition and process: parametric design and rapid protyping Spon Press. pp. 147- 162 ,(2003)
C. Eastman, F. Wang, S.-J. You, D. Yang, Deployment of an AEC industry sector product model Computer-aided Design. ,vol. 37, pp. 1214- 1228 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.CAD.2004.11.007
Kevin Bowcutt, A Perspective on the Future of Aerospace Vehicle Design 12th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies. ,(2003) , 10.2514/6.2003-6957
Yan Jin, Raymond E. Levitt, The virtual design team: A computational model of project organizations Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. ,vol. 2, pp. 171- 195 ,(1996) , 10.1007/BF00127273
Andrew Booker, Design and analysis of computer experiments 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. ,(1998) , 10.2514/6.1998-4757
Kristina Shea, Robert Aish, Marina Gourtovaia, Towards integrated performance-driven generative design tools Automation in Construction. ,vol. 14, pp. 253- 264 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.AUTCON.2004.07.002
Keunhyoung Lee, Sangyoon Chin, Jaejun Kim, A Core System for Design Information Management Using Industry Foundation Classes Computer-aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. ,vol. 18, pp. 286- 298 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1467-8667.00318
Jan Vandenbrande, Thomas Grandine, Thomas Hogan, The search for the perfect body: Shape Control for multidisciplinary design optimization 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. ,(2006) , 10.2514/6.2006-928