[Survival analysis of adjustable continence therapy device (ACT®/proACT®): a new message for patients].

作者: AS Bajeot , T Brierre , JB Beauval , P Roulette , B Bordier

DOI: 10.1016/J.PUROL.2020.10.005

关键词:

摘要: Introduction The main purpose was to assess the failure free survival of adjustable continence therapy ACT®/proACT® after obtained and seek factors influencing it. Material methods Retrospective, single-center study peri-urethral balloons implanted between 2007 2014. Efficacy defined by wearing 0 or 1 safety pad per day. primary end point time estimated from a curve (Kaplan-Meier). Factors that could influence were: sex, age, radiotherapy, diabetes, number before surgery, balloon inflation, early complications, mixed urinary incontinence previous placement. They were analyzed in COX regression. Results Of 82 placed, 41 effective 36 patients. 50 % at 60 months. Radiotherapy, diabetes placement appeared significantly decrease (P=0.031;P=0.025;P=0.029, respectively). Fifteen still last follow-up, one lost follow-up 25 required re-intervention for loss efficacy. cause efficacy system leakage. Fifty-two percent became ineffective replaced new 28% an artificial sphincter. Conclusion Patients who continent with (ACT®/proACT®) had surgery probability 5 years Radiotherapy seems be risk factor loss. Level evidence IV.

参考文章(24)
Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler, Stéphane Bart, Pierre Mozer, Ballons ACT™/Pro-ACT™ (Medtronic, Etats-Unis) : technique et indications Progrès en Urologie - FMC. ,vol. 19, ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.FPUROL.2008.08.001
Jacques Bernstein, Veronique Delaporte, Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler, Henry Botto, Pierre Costa, Thierry Lebret, Florence Cour, Jacques Benchetrit, Philippe Grise, Treatment of Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence Using a Minimally Invasive Adjustable Continence Balloon Device, ProACT: Results of a Preliminary, Multicenter, Pilot Study Urology. ,vol. 71, pp. 256- 260 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2007.08.062
T.H. Wagner, Donald L. Patrick, T.G. Bavendam, M.L. Martin, D.E Buesching, Quality of Life of Persons With Urinary Incontinence: Development of a New Measure Urology. ,vol. 47, pp. 67- 71 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80384-7
F.M.J. Martens, M.I. Lampe, J.P.F.A. Heesakkers, ProACT for stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Urologia Internationalis. ,vol. 82, pp. 394- 398 ,(2009) , 10.1159/000218526
Paul Riss, Julia Kargl, Quality of life and urinary incontinence in women Maturitas. ,vol. 68, pp. 137- 142 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.MATURITAS.2010.11.006
Morgan Rouprêt, Vincent Misraï, Pierre-Nicolas Gosseine, Stéphane Bart, Florence Cour, Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler, Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence Following Prostate Surgery With Minimally Invasive Adjustable Continence Balloon Implants: Functional Results From a Single Center Prospective Study The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 186, pp. 198- 203 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2011.03.016
Ervin Kocjancic, Simone Crivellaro, Stefania Ranzoni, Daniele Bonvini, Paolo Gontero, Bruno Frea, Adjustable Continence Therapy for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-centre study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. ,vol. 41, pp. 324- 328 ,(2007) , 10.1080/00365590601153488
Emily S. Lukacz, Yahir Santiago-Lastra, Michael E. Albo, Linda Brubaker, Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review JAMA. ,vol. 318, pp. 1592- 1604 ,(2017) , 10.1001/JAMA.2017.12137
Toscane C. Noordhoff, Jeroen R. Scheepe, Bertil F.M. Blok, Outcome and complications of adjustable continence therapy (ProACT™) after radical prostatectomy: 10 years' experience in 143 patients. Neurourology and Urodynamics. ,vol. 37, pp. 1419- 1425 ,(2018) , 10.1002/NAU.23463
Sebastian Nestler, C. Thomas, A. Neisius, P. Rubenwolf, F. Roos, C. Hampel, J. W. Thüroff, Long-term results of ProACT primary and repeat implantation for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men World Journal of Urology. ,vol. 37, pp. 1173- 1179 ,(2019) , 10.1007/S00345-018-2483-4