Low structural complexity of nonnative grassland habitat exposes prey to higher predation.

作者: Grant Norbury , Wouter Overmeire

DOI: 10.1002/EAP.1830

关键词:

摘要: The structural complexity of vegetation can have profound effects on the hunting efficiency predators, thereby affecting their intake rate prey. While studies shown that play an important role in managing unwanted impacts it is less clear how invasive affects vulnerability terrestrial Short nonnative pasture species bred for agricultural production, example, are highly and pervade grassland ecosystems worldwide. They generally low compared with taller native they often displace. We conducted controlled experiments to test whether pastures expose fauna greater predation risk. Survival invertebrates (tethered locusts) subject by mammalian insectivores (European hedgehogs) (0.10 per 24 h; 95% CI, 0.08-0.13) was than one-half structurally complex perennial tussock (bunch) grass (0.24; binomial 0.18-0.31). A significant positive relationship apparent between (grass dry stem density) surrounding each locust survival. In a second experiment, survival locusts placed solely increased decreasing density tussock, presumably reflecting fewer resource-rich patches which predators could focus. These results demonstrate invasion simple exposes prey risk predation. This concerning from global nature conservation perspective given conversion nearly world's temperate grasslands agriculture includes range invasive, simple, nonnative, plant species. Minimizing maintaining restoring habitat structure may be useful option reducing

参考文章(51)
D. F. Shanahan, R. Mathieu, P. J. Seddon, Fine-scale movement of the European hedgehog: An application of spool-and-thread tracking New Zealand Journal of Ecology. ,vol. 31, pp. 160- 168 ,(2007)
J. S. Brown, B. P. Kotler, L. Blaustein, Predator facilitation: the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behavior of gerbils Annales Zoologici Fennici. ,vol. 29, pp. 199- 206 ,(1992)
Tim S. Doherty, Chris R. Dickman, Dale G. Nimmo, Euan G. Ritchie, Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances Biological Conservation. ,vol. 190, pp. 60- 68 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.05.013
ANTHONY D. ARTHUR, ROGER P. PECH, CHRIS R. DICKMAN, Habitat structure mediates the non‐lethal effects of predation on enclosed populations of house mice Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 73, pp. 867- 877 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.0021-8790.2004.00864.X
J. C. Walsh, K. A. Wilson, J. Benshemesh, H. P. Possingham, Unexpected outcomes of invasive predator control: the importance of evaluating conservation management actions Animal Conservation. ,vol. 15, pp. 319- 328 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2012.00537.X
Maik Rehnus, Veronika Braunisch, Klaus Hackländer, Lea Jost, Kurt Bollmann, The seasonal trade-off between food and cover in the alpine mountain hare ( Lepus timidus ) European Journal of Wildlife Research. ,vol. 62, pp. 11- 21 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S10344-015-0963-Z
Isabelle M. Côté, William J. Sutherland, The Effectiveness of Removing Predators to Protect Bird Populations Conservation Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. 395- 405 ,(1997) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1997.95410.X
Melanie J. Bishop, James E. Byers, Predation risk predicts use of a novel habitat Oikos. ,vol. 124, pp. 1225- 1231 ,(2015) , 10.1111/OIK.01967
Bart M. C. Grutters, Bart J. A. Pollux, Wilco C. E. P. Verberk, Elisabeth S. Bakker, Native and Non-Native Plants Provide Similar Refuge to Invertebrate Prey, but Less than Artificial Plants PLOS ONE. ,vol. 10, pp. e0124455- ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0124455